Product comparison · 2 hardware firewalls

Zyxel USG 1900 vs Zyxel VPN50 hardware firewall 0.8 Gbit/s

Add a product
  • 14specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 4identical
  • 21known for one product only

Key differences

The Zyxel USG 1900 has 6.2 Gbit/s more firewall throughput than the Zyxel VPN50 hardware firewall 0.8 Gbit/s (7 Gbit/s vs 0.8 Gbit/s). The Zyxel USG 1900 has 0.75 Gbit/s more VPN throughput than the Zyxel VPN50 hardware firewall 0.8 Gbit/s (0.9 Gbit/s vs 0.15 Gbit/s). The Zyxel USG 1900 has 516,811.5 h more mean time between failures (MTBF) than the Zyxel VPN50 hardware firewall 0.8 Gbit/s (560811.5 h vs 44000 h). Weight: 3.3 kg on the Zyxel USG 1900, 880 g on the Zyxel VPN50 hardware firewall 0.8 Gbit/s.

  • Firewall throughput
    • USG 1900:7 Gbit/s
    • VPN50 hardware firewall 0.8 Gbit/s:0.8 Gbit/s
  • VPN throughput
    • USG 1900:0.9 Gbit/s
    • VPN50 hardware firewall 0.8 Gbit/s:0.15 Gbit/s
  • Mean time between failures (MTBF)
    • USG 1900:560811.5 h
    • VPN50 hardware firewall 0.8 Gbit/s:44000 h
  • VPN tunnels quantity
    • USG 1900:2000
    • VPN50 hardware firewall 0.8 Gbit/s:50
  • Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
    • USG 1900:8
    • VPN50 hardware firewall 0.8 Gbit/s:4
  • Input current
    • USG 1900:1.3 A
    • VPN50 hardware firewall 0.8 Gbit/s:2 A
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • USG 1900:58.5 W
    • VPN50 hardware firewall 0.8 Gbit/s:12 W
  • Weight
    • USG 1900:3.3 kg
    • VPN50 hardware firewall 0.8 Gbit/s:880 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of USG 1900, VPN50
35 specifications
Data transmission2 differ
Firewall throughputDiffers7 Gbit/s0.8 Gbit/s
VPN throughputDiffers0.9 Gbit/s0.15 Gbit/s
Performance1 differ
Concurrent connectionsKnown for one500000Unknown — not stated by the source
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs560811.5 h44000 h
Heat dissipationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source40.92 BTU/h
Network1 differ
Number of VPN connectionsKnown for one755Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of usersKnown for one55 user(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
VPN tunnels quantityDiffers200050
Number of VLANsKnown for one128Unknown — not stated by the source
Concurrent SSL/VPN connections (default)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10
Concurrent SSL/VPN connections (maximum)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers84
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Ethernet DMZ ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4
SFP module slots quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
WAN connectionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceEthernet (RJ-45)
Designidentical
Rack mountingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
AC input voltageKnown for one100-240 VUnknown — not stated by the source
AC input frequencyKnown for one50 - 60 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Input currentDiffers1.3 A2 A
Power consumption (typical)Differs58.5 W12 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 - 90%
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for one430 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one250 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one44 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers3.3 kg880 g
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source216 x 143 x 33 mm
Other features2 differ
Firewall throughputDiffers7000 Mbit/s800 Mbit/s
VPN throughputDiffers900 Mbit/s150 Mbit/s

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More hardware firewall comparisons

All hardware firewall comparisons