Product comparison · 2 hardware firewalls

Zyxel USG 1900 vs Zyxel VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s

Add a product
  • 14specifications compared
  • 11differ
  • 3identical
  • 16known for one product only

Key differences

The Zyxel USG 1900 has 6.15 Gbit/s more firewall throughput than the Zyxel VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s (7 Gbit/s vs 0.85 Gbit/s). The Zyxel USG 1900 has 516,811.5 h more mean time between failures (MTBF) than the Zyxel VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s (560811.5 h vs 44000 h). The Zyxel USG 1900 has 1,980 more VPN tunnels quantity than the Zyxel VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s (2000 vs 20). Number of users: 55 user(s) on the Zyxel USG 1900, 50000 user(s) on the Zyxel VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s. AC input voltage: 100-240 V on the Zyxel USG 1900, 110 - 240 V on the Zyxel VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s.

  • Firewall throughput
    • USG 1900:7 Gbit/s
    • VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s:0.85 Gbit/s
  • Mean time between failures (MTBF)
    • USG 1900:560811.5 h
    • VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s:44000 h
  • Number of users
    • USG 1900:55 user(s)
    • VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s:50000 user(s)
  • VPN tunnels quantity
    • USG 1900:2000
    • VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s:20
  • Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
    • USG 1900:8
    • VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s:3
  • AC input voltage
    • USG 1900:100-240 V
    • VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s:110 - 240 V
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • USG 1900:58.5 W
    • VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s:13.1 W
  • Storage temperature (T-T)
    • USG 1900:-30 - 70 °C
    • VPN2S hardware firewall 0.85 Gbit/s:-30 - 60 °C

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of USG 1900, VPN2S
30 specifications
Data transmission1 differ
Firewall throughputDiffers7 Gbit/s0.85 Gbit/s
VPN throughputKnown for one0.9 Gbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Performance1 differ
Concurrent connectionsKnown for one500000Unknown — not stated by the source
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs560811.5 h44000 h
Heat dissipationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source44.7 BTU/h
Network2 differ
Number of VPN connectionsKnown for one755Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of usersDiffers55 user(s)50000 user(s)
VPN tunnels quantityDiffers200020
Number of VLANsKnown for one128Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Connectivity technologyKnown for oneWiredUnknown — not stated by the source
USB 2.0 ports quantity22
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers83
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10,100,1000 Mbit/s
WAN connectionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceEthernet (RJ-45)
Designidentical
Rack mountingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
AC input voltageDiffers100-240 V110 - 240 V
AC input frequency50 - 60 Hz50 - 60 Hz
Input currentKnown for one1.3 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Differs58.5 W13.1 W
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)0 - 40 °C0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs-30 - 70 °C-30 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs10 - 90%20 - 95%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 - 95%
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for one430 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one250 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one44 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers3.3 kg1.13 kg
Other features1 differ
Firewall throughputDiffers7000 Mbit/s850 Mbit/s
VPN throughputKnown for one900 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More hardware firewall comparisons

All hardware firewall comparisons