Product comparison · 2 hardware firewalls

Zyxel USG 1900 vs Zyxel VPN100 hardware firewall 2 Gbit/s

15specifications compared
10differ
5identical
18known for one product only

Key differences

The Zyxel USG 1900 has 5 Gbit/s more firewall throughput than the Zyxel VPN100 hardware firewall 2 Gbit/s (7 Gbit/s vs 2 Gbit/s). The Zyxel USG 1900 has 0.4 Gbit/s more VPN throughput than the Zyxel VPN100 hardware firewall 2 Gbit/s (0.9 Gbit/s vs 0.5 Gbit/s). The Zyxel USG 1900 has 31,123.3 h more mean time between failures (MTBF) than the Zyxel VPN100 hardware firewall 2 Gbit/s (560811.5 h vs 529688.2 h).

Firewall throughput
- USG 1900:7 Gbit/s
- VPN100 hardware firewall 2 Gbit/s:2 Gbit/s
VPN throughput
- USG 1900:0.9 Gbit/s
- VPN100 hardware firewall 2 Gbit/s:0.5 Gbit/s
Mean time between failures (MTBF)
- USG 1900:560811.5 h
- VPN100 hardware firewall 2 Gbit/s:529688.2 h
VPN tunnels quantity
- USG 1900:2000
- VPN100 hardware firewall 2 Gbit/s:100
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
- USG 1900:8
- VPN100 hardware firewall 2 Gbit/s:4
Input current
- USG 1900:1.3 A
- VPN100 hardware firewall 2 Gbit/s:2.5 A
Power consumption (typical)
- USG 1900:58.5 W
- VPN100 hardware firewall 2 Gbit/s:13.3 W
Weight
- USG 1900:3.3 kg
- VPN100 hardware firewall 2 Gbit/s:1.4 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of USG 1900, VPN100
33 specifications	A Zyxel USG 1900 View product	B Zyxel VPN100 hardware firewall 2 Gbit/s Model VPN100 View product
Data transmission2 differ
Firewall throughputDiffers	7 Gbit/s	2 Gbit/s
VPN throughputDiffers	0.9 Gbit/s	0.5 Gbit/s
Performance1 differ
Concurrent connectionsKnown for one	500000	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs	560811.5 h	529688.2 h
Heat dissipationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	45.38 BTU/h
Network1 differ
Number of VPN connectionsKnown for one	755	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of usersKnown for one	55 user(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
VPN tunnels quantityDiffers	2000	100
Number of VLANsKnown for one	128	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers	8	4
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Ethernet DMZ ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4
SFP module slots quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
WAN connectionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Ethernet (RJ-45)
Power2 differ
AC input voltageKnown for one	100-240 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input frequencyKnown for one	50 - 60 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Input currentDiffers	1.3 A	2.5 A
Power consumption (typical)Differs	58.5 W	13.3 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 90%
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for one	430 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	250 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	44 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers	3.3 kg	1.4 kg
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	272 x 187 x 36 mm
Other features2 differ
Firewall throughputDiffers	7000 Mbit/s	2000 Mbit/s
VPN throughputDiffers	900 Mbit/s	500 Mbit/s

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More hardware firewall comparisons

All hardware firewall comparisons