Product comparison · 2 hardware firewalls

Zyxel USG 1900 vs Zyxel USG Flex 100HP

13specifications compared
8differ
5identical
29known for one product only

Key differences

The Zyxel USG 1900 has 4 Gbit/s more firewall throughput than the Zyxel USG Flex 100HP (7 Gbit/s vs 3 Gbit/s). The Zyxel USG 1900 has 10,428.9247 h more mean time between failures (MTBF) than the Zyxel USG Flex 100HP (560811.5 h vs 550382.5753 h). The Zyxel USG 1900 has 1,950 more VPN tunnels quantity than the Zyxel USG Flex 100HP (2000 vs 50).

Firewall throughput
- USG 1900:7 Gbit/s
- USG Flex 100HP:3 Gbit/s
Mean time between failures (MTBF)
- USG 1900:560811.5 h
- USG Flex 100HP:550382.5753 h
VPN tunnels quantity
- USG 1900:2000
- USG Flex 100HP:50
Number of VLANs
- USG 1900:128
- USG Flex 100HP:16
Width
- USG 1900:430 mm
- USG Flex 100HP:216 mm
Depth
- USG 1900:250 mm
- USG Flex 100HP:143 mm
Height
- USG 1900:44 mm
- USG Flex 100HP:33 mm
Weight
- USG 1900:3.3 kg
- USG Flex 100HP:1.05 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of USG 1900, USG Flex 100HP
42 specifications	A Zyxel USG 1900 View product	B Zyxel USG Flex 100HP View product
Data transmission1 differ
Firewall throughputDiffers	7 Gbit/s	3 Gbit/s
VPN (IMIX) throughputKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	750 Mbit/s
IPS/IDS throughputKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1500 Mbit/s
VPN throughputKnown for one	0.9 Gbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performance1 differ
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs	560811.5 h	550382.5753 h
Concurrent connectionsKnown for one	500000	Unknown — not stated by the source
Network2 differ
VPN tunnels quantityDiffers	2000	50
Number of VLANsDiffers	128	16
Number of VPN connectionsKnown for one	755	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of usersKnown for one	55 user(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Securityidentical
DDoS protectionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
VPN supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IKEv2, IPSec, SSL
Management featuresidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Console portKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	RJ-45
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1000 Mbit/s
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Form factorKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Desktop
Rack mountingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
DC input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	19 V
Power consumption (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	51.2 W
AC input voltageKnown for one	100-240 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input frequencyKnown for one	50 - 60 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Input currentKnown for one	1.3 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	58.5 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 90%
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	430 mm	216 mm
DepthDiffers	250 mm	143 mm
HeightDiffers	44 mm	33 mm
WeightDiffers	3.3 kg	1.05 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	278 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	189 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	99 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.91 kg
Other featuresidentical
Firewall throughputKnown for one	7000 Mbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
VPN throughputKnown for one	900 Mbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More hardware firewall comparisons

All hardware firewall comparisons