Product comparison · 2 hardware firewalls

Allied Telesis AT-AR2050V hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s vs Securepoint Black Dwarf Pro G5 VPN as a Service

Add a product
  • 16specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 3identical
  • 37known for one product only

Key differences

The Securepoint Black Dwarf Pro G5 VPN as a Service has 2.08 Gbit/s more firewall throughput than the Allied Telesis AT-AR2050V hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s (2.83 Gbit/s vs 0.75 Gbit/s). The Securepoint Black Dwarf Pro G5 VPN as a Service has 0.02 Gbit/s more VPN throughput than the Allied Telesis AT-AR2050V hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s (0.42 Gbit/s vs 0.4 Gbit/s). The Securepoint Black Dwarf Pro G5 VPN as a Service has 5 - 80% more operating relative humidity (H-H) than the Allied Telesis AT-AR2050V hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s (10 - 80% vs 5 - 80%). Connectivity technology: Wired on the Allied Telesis AT-AR2050V hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s, Wired & Wireless on the Securepoint Black Dwarf Pro G5 VPN as a Service. AC input voltage: 90-260 V on the Allied Telesis AT-AR2050V hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s, 110-240 V on the Securepoint Black Dwarf Pro G5 VPN as a Service.

  • Firewall throughput
    • AT-AR2050V hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:0.75 Gbit/s
    • Black Dwarf Pro G5 VPN as a Service:2.83 Gbit/s
  • VPN throughput
    • AT-AR2050V hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:0.4 Gbit/s
    • Black Dwarf Pro G5 VPN as a Service:0.42 Gbit/s
  • Connectivity technology
    • AT-AR2050V hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:Wired
    • Black Dwarf Pro G5 VPN as a Service:Wired & Wireless
  • AC input voltage
    • AT-AR2050V hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:90-260 V
    • Black Dwarf Pro G5 VPN as a Service:110-240 V
  • AC input frequency
    • AT-AR2050V hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:47/63 Hz
    • Black Dwarf Pro G5 VPN as a Service:50 - 60 Hz
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • AT-AR2050V hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:0 - 50 °C
    • Black Dwarf Pro G5 VPN as a Service:0 - 40 °C
  • Storage temperature (T-T)
    • AT-AR2050V hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:-25 - 70 °C
    • Black Dwarf Pro G5 VPN as a Service:-20 - 60 °C
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • AT-AR2050V hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:5 - 80%
    • Black Dwarf Pro G5 VPN as a Service:10 - 80%

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of AT-AR2050V, Black Dwarf Pro G5 VPN as a Service
53 specifications
Data transmission2 differ
Firewall throughputDiffers0.75 Gbit/s2.83 Gbit/s
VPN throughputDiffers0.4 Gbit/s0.42 Gbit/s
IPS/IDS throughputKnown for one200 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
TLS interceptionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source900 MB/s
Reset buttonKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Built-in processorKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Internal memoryKnown for one512 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Processor frequencyKnown for one800 MHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Processor coresKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Networkidentical
Wi-FiKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Wi-Fi standardsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
Number of usersKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source15 user(s)
Wi-Fi bandKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDual-band (2.4 GHz / 5 GHz)
VPN tunnels quantityKnown for one50Unknown — not stated by the source
Dynamic routingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Static routeKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Multicast supportKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Security1 differ
Security algorithmsDiffers3DES, 128-bit AES, 192-bit AES, 256-bit AES, SHA-1, SHA-2, SSHAES
Management featuresidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
On/off switchKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Web-based managementKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Connectivity technologyDiffersWiredWired & Wireless
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1000 Mbit/s
HDMI ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
DC-in jackKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
WAN connectionKnown for oneEthernet (RJ-45)Unknown — not stated by the source
Storageidentical
Storage media typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSSD
Flash memoryKnown for one4096 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Rack mountingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Form factorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDesktop
Power2 differ
AC input voltageDiffers90-260 V110-240 V
AC input frequencyDiffers47/63 Hz50 - 60 Hz
Input currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.2 A
DC input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12 V
Power consumption (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source46 W
Power supplyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source40 W
Power consumption (typical)Known for one14 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions3 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs0 - 50 °C0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs-25 - 70 °C-20 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs5 - 80%10 - 80%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one5 - 95%Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating altitudeKnown for one0 - 2000 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions2 differ
DepthDiffers220 mm105 mm
HeightDiffers42.5 mm44 mm
WeightKnown for one1.8 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Rack mount kitKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Other features2 differ
Firewall throughputDiffers750 Mbit/s2830 Mbit/s
VPN throughputDiffers400 Mbit/s420 Mbit/s
Protocolsidentical
Routing protocolsKnown for oneBGP, IPUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More hardware firewall comparisons

All hardware firewall comparisons