Product comparison · 2 hardware firewalls

Allied Telesis AT-AR2050V-30 hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s vs Allied Telesis AT-AR4050S hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s

33specifications compared
15differ
18identical
29known for one product only

Key differences

The Allied Telesis AT-AR4050S hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s has 1.15 Gbit/s more firewall throughput than the Allied Telesis AT-AR2050V-30 hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s (1.9 Gbit/s vs 0.75 Gbit/s). The Allied Telesis AT-AR4050S hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s has 0.6 Gbit/s more VPN throughput than the Allied Telesis AT-AR2050V-30 hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s (1 Gbit/s vs 0.4 Gbit/s). The Allied Telesis AT-AR4050S hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s has 550 Mbit/s more IPS/IDS throughput than the Allied Telesis AT-AR2050V-30 hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s (750 Mbit/s vs 200 Mbit/s). Routing protocols: BGP, OSPF, RIP on the Allied Telesis AT-AR2050V-30 hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s, BGP4, OSPF, RIP-1, RIP-2 on the Allied Telesis AT-AR4050S hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s. Operating temperature (T-T): 0 - 45 °C on the Allied Telesis AT-AR2050V-30 hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s, 0 - 50 °C on the Allied Telesis AT-AR4050S hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s.

Firewall throughput
- AT-AR2050V-30 hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:0.75 Gbit/s
- AT-AR4050S hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:1.9 Gbit/s
VPN throughput
- AT-AR2050V-30 hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:0.4 Gbit/s
- AT-AR4050S hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:1 Gbit/s
IPS/IDS throughput
- AT-AR2050V-30 hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:200 Mbit/s
- AT-AR4050S hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:750 Mbit/s
Maximum firewall connections per second
- AT-AR2050V-30 hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:3600
- AT-AR4050S hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:12000
Internal memory
- AT-AR2050V-30 hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:512 MB
- AT-AR4050S hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:2048 MB
Processor frequency
- AT-AR2050V-30 hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:800 MHz
- AT-AR4050S hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:1560 MHz
Concurrent connections
- AT-AR2050V-30 hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:100000
- AT-AR4050S hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:300000
Routing protocols
- AT-AR2050V-30 hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s:BGP, OSPF, RIP
- AT-AR4050S hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s:BGP4, OSPF, RIP-1, RIP-2

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of AT-AR2050V-30, AT-AR4050S
62 specifications	A Allied Telesis AT-AR2050V-30 hardware firewall 0.75 Gbit/s Model AT-AR2050V-30 View product	B Allied Telesis AT-AR4050S hardware firewall 1.9 Gbit/s Model AT-AR4050S View product
Data transmission4 differ
Firewall throughputDiffers	0.75 Gbit/s	1.9 Gbit/s
VPN throughputDiffers	0.4 Gbit/s	1 Gbit/s
IPS/IDS throughputDiffers	200 Mbit/s	750 Mbit/s
Maximum firewall connections per secondDiffers	3600	12000
Performance3 differ
Internal memoryDiffers	512 MB	2048 MB
Processor frequencyDiffers	800 MHz	1560 MHz
Concurrent connectionsDiffers	100000	300000
Reset buttonKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
SyslogKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Noise levelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	28.4 dB
Networkidentical
Wi-FiKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of usersKnown for one	100 user(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
VPN tunnels quantityKnown for one	50	Unknown — not stated by the source
Quality of Service (QoS) supportKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Networking standardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IEEE 802.1Q, IEEE 802.3ad
Security1 differ
Security algorithmsDiffers	3DES, 128-bit AES, 192-bit AES, 256-bit AES, IPSec, SHA-1, SHA-256, SSL/TLS	3DES, 128-bit AES, 192-bit AES, 256-bit AES, WEP, WPA
DDoS protectionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
VPN supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IPsec, SHA-1, SHA-256, SHA-512, IKEv2, SSL/TLS VPN
Protocols1 differ
Routing protocolsDiffers	BGP, OSPF, RIP	BGP4, OSPF, RIP-1, RIP-2
Management protocolsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IPv6, SNMPv6, Telnetv6, SSHv6
Management featuresidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
URL filteringKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
On/off switchKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Gigabit Ethernet (copper) ports quantityKnown for one	5	Unknown — not stated by the source
Console portKnown for one	RJ-45	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one	10,100,1000 Mbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	8
Compatible memory cardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	SD, SDHC
Designidentical
Built-in displayKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (max)Differs	14 W	27 W
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	27 W
Certificates1 differ
CertificationDiffers	EN55022 class A, FCC class A, VCCI class A	EN55022 class A, FCC class A, VCCI class A EN55024, EN61000-3-levels 2 (Harmonics), and 3 (Flicker) UL60950-1, CAN/CSA-C22.2 No. 60950-1-03, EN60950-1, EN60825-1, AS/NZS 60950.1 UL, cUL, TuV RoHS
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	0 - 45 °C	0 - 50 °C
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	210 x 220 x 42.5 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers	1.8 kg	1.7 kg
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	425 mm
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	210 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	220 mm
Other features2 differ
Firewall throughputDiffers	750 Mbit/s	1900 Mbit/s
VPN throughputDiffers	400 Mbit/s	1000 Mbit/s
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	365 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	260 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	115 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.6 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More hardware firewall comparisons

All hardware firewall comparisons