Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Philips MiniVac FC6148/01R1 handheld vacuum White, Green Dust bag vs Sogo ASP-SS-16140 handheld vacuum Black, Silver Bagless

21specifications compared
17differ
4identical
27known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips MiniVac FC6148/01R1 handheld vacuum White, Green Dust bag has 10 W more maximum input power than the Sogo ASP-SS-16140 handheld vacuum Black, Silver Bagless (100 W vs 90 W). The Sogo ASP-SS-16140 handheld vacuum Black, Silver Bagless has 21 min more runtime than the Philips MiniVac FC6148/01R1 handheld vacuum White, Green Dust bag (30 min vs 9 min). The Philips MiniVac FC6148/01R1 handheld vacuum White, Green Dust bag has 3.5 h more charging time than the Sogo ASP-SS-16140 handheld vacuum Black, Silver Bagless (8 h vs 4.5 h). Cleaning type: Dry&wet on the Philips MiniVac FC6148/01R1 handheld vacuum White, Green Dust bag, Dry on the Sogo ASP-SS-16140 handheld vacuum Black, Silver Bagless. Dirt separating method: Cyclonic on the Philips MiniVac FC6148/01R1 handheld vacuum White, Green Dust bag, Filtering on the Sogo ASP-SS-16140 handheld vacuum Black, Silver Bagless.

Cleaning type
- MiniVac FC6148/01R1 handheld vacuum White, Green Dust bag:Dry&wet
- ASP-SS-16140 handheld vacuum Black, Silver Bagless:Dry
Dirt separating method
- MiniVac FC6148/01R1 handheld vacuum White, Green Dust bag:Cyclonic
- ASP-SS-16140 handheld vacuum Black, Silver Bagless:Filtering
Dust container type
- MiniVac FC6148/01R1 handheld vacuum White, Green Dust bag:Dust bag
- ASP-SS-16140 handheld vacuum Black, Silver Bagless:Bagless
Product colour
- MiniVac FC6148/01R1 handheld vacuum White, Green Dust bag:White, Green
- ASP-SS-16140 handheld vacuum Black, Silver Bagless:Black, Silver
LED indicators
- MiniVac FC6148/01R1 handheld vacuum White, Green Dust bag:Power, Status
- ASP-SS-16140 handheld vacuum Black, Silver Bagless:Yes
Maximum input power
- MiniVac FC6148/01R1 handheld vacuum White, Green Dust bag:100 W
- ASP-SS-16140 handheld vacuum Black, Silver Bagless:90 W
Runtime
- MiniVac FC6148/01R1 handheld vacuum White, Green Dust bag:9 min
- ASP-SS-16140 handheld vacuum Black, Silver Bagless:30 min
Charging time
- MiniVac FC6148/01R1 handheld vacuum White, Green Dust bag:8 h
- ASP-SS-16140 handheld vacuum Black, Silver Bagless:4.5 h

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of FC6148/01R1, ASP-SS-16140
48 specifications	A Philips MiniVac FC6148/01R1 handheld vacuum White, Green Dust bag Model FC6148/01R1 View product	B Sogo ASP-SS-16140 handheld vacuum Black, Silver Bagless Model ASP-SS-16140 View product
Performance2 differ
Cleaning typeDiffers	Dry&wet	Dry
Cleaning surfacesKnown for one	Upholstery	Unknown — not stated by the source
AirflowKnown for one	950 l/min	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power controlKnown for one	Auto	Unknown — not stated by the source
Filtration systemKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Air filtration stages quantityKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dirt separating methodDiffers	Cyclonic	Filtering
Noise levelKnown for one	81 dB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Overheat protectionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Design2 differ
Dust container typeDiffers	Dust bag	Bagless
Product colourDiffers	White, Green	Black, Silver
Dirt capacity dryKnown for one	0.5 L	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomics1 differ
Battery low indicationKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsDiffers	Power, Status	Yes
Washable dust bagKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Washable filterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power5 differ
Maximum input powerDiffers	100 W	90 W
RuntimeDiffers	9 min	30 min
Charging timeDiffers	8 h	4.5 h
Suction powerDiffers	22 AW	13 Pa
Battery voltageDiffers	10.8 V	11.1 V
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	100 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery typeKnown for one	Built-in	Unknown — not stated by the source
Runtime (low speed)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30 min
Runtime with motorized brush (high speed)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	18 min
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	335 mm	90 mm
DepthDiffers	508 mm	110 mm
HeightDiffers	490 mm	420 mm
WeightDiffers	800 g	1 kg
Packaging data3 differ
Package widthDiffers	160 mm	100 mm
Package depthDiffers	460 mm	120 mm
Package heightDiffers	160 mm	440 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.1 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Vacuum wand assemblyKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Brush toolKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Crevice toolKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Quantity per packKnown for one	1 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Battery recharge timeKnown for one	8 h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dust capacityKnown for one	0.5 L	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum airflowKnown for one	950 l/min	Unknown — not stated by the source
Special featuresKnown for one	Charging indication; Soft touch handle	Unknown — not stated by the source
VacuumKnown for one	4.3 kPa	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design featuresKnown for one	Translucent dust chamber	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Dangerous goodsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons