Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6140/60 vs Philips MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless

20specifications compared
10differ
10identical
8known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless has 330 l/min more airflow than the Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6140/60 (950 l/min vs 620 l/min). The Philips MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless has 6 dB more noise level than the Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6140/60 (81 dB vs 75 dB). The Philips MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless has 55 W more maximum input power than the Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6140/60 (100 W vs 45 W). Product colour: White on the Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6140/60, Champagne, Green on the Philips MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless. Battery technology: Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH) on the Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6140/60, Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion) on the Philips MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless.

Airflow
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6140/60:620 l/min
- MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless:950 l/min
Noise level
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6140/60:75 dB
- MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless:81 dB
Product colour
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6140/60:White
- MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless:Champagne, Green
Maximum input power
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6140/60:45 W
- MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless:100 W
Charging time
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6140/60:18 h
- MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless:8 h
Suction power
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6140/60:8 AW
- MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless:22 AW
Battery voltage
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6140/60:3.6 V
- MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless:10.8 V
Battery technology
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6140/60:Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)
- MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless:Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of FC6140/60, FC6148/71
28 specifications	A Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6140/60 Model FC6140/60 View product	B Philips MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless Model FC6148/71 View product
Performance2 differ
Cleaning type	Dry	Dry
AirflowDiffers	620 l/min	950 l/min
Noise levelDiffers	75 dB	81 dB
Dirt separating methodKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Cyclonic
Design1 differ
Dust container type	Bagless	Bagless
Product colourDiffers	White	Champagne, Green
Dirt capacity dry	0.5 L	0.5 L
Ergonomicsidentical
Recharge indicatorKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Soft grip	Yes	Yes
Power4 differ
Maximum input powerDiffers	45 W	100 W
Runtime	9 min	9 min
Charging timeDiffers	18 h	8 h
Suction powerDiffers	8 AW	22 AW
Battery voltageDiffers	3.6 V	10.8 V
Battery1 differ
Battery technologyDiffers	Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)	Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	1.3 kg	800 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package width	160 mm	160 mm
Package depth	460 mm	460 mm
Package height	160 mm	160 mm
Packaging contentidentical
Vacuum wand assembly	No	No
Charging base	Yes	Yes
Brush toolKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Crevice toolKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Other features1 differ
Dust capacityKnown for one	0.5 L	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum airflowKnown for one	620 l/min	Unknown — not stated by the source
VacuumDiffers	2.7 kPa	4.3 kPa
A-box dimensions (LxWxH)Known for one	508 x 335 x 490 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
A-box number of piecesKnown for one	6 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons