Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Hoover SM550AC 001 vs Philips MiniVac FC6141/01R1 handheld vacuum Black Bagless

7specifications compared
3differ
4identical
32known for one product only

Key differences

Dirt separating method: Filtering on the Hoover SM550AC 001, Cyclonic on the Philips MiniVac FC6141/01R1 handheld vacuum Black Bagless. Product colour: White, Black on the Hoover SM550AC 001, Black on the Philips MiniVac FC6141/01R1 handheld vacuum Black Bagless. Power source: Battery on the Hoover SM550AC 001, DC on the Philips MiniVac FC6141/01R1 handheld vacuum Black Bagless.

Dirt separating method
- SM550AC 001:Filtering
- MiniVac FC6141/01R1 handheld vacuum Black Bagless:Cyclonic
Product colour
- SM550AC 001:White, Black
- MiniVac FC6141/01R1 handheld vacuum Black Bagless:Black
Power source
- SM550AC 001:Battery
- MiniVac FC6141/01R1 handheld vacuum Black Bagless:DC

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of SM550AC 001, FC6141/01R1
39 specifications	A Hoover SM550AC 001 View product	B Philips MiniVac FC6141/01R1 handheld vacuum Black Bagless Model FC6141/01R1 View product
Performance1 differ
Cleaning type	Dry	Dry
AirflowKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	840 l/min
Filtration systemKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Air filtration stages quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Dirt separating methodDiffers	Filtering	Cyclonic
Noise levelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	81 dB
Vacuum air filteringKnown for one	Micro	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Dust container type	Bagless	Bagless
Product colourDiffers	White, Black	Black
Dirt capacity dry	0.5 L	0.5 L
Wheels materialKnown for one	Rubber	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Charging
Soft gripKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Accessory storageKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery low indicationKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomic handleKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Recharge indicatorKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Wall mountableKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power sourceDiffers	Battery	DC
Maximum input powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	120 W
Suction powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4200 Pa
AC input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	12 V
Packaging contentidentical
Car plugKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Brush toolKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Crevice tool	Yes	Yes
Vacuum brushes includedKnown for one	Mini turbo brush	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Dust capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.5 L
Maximum airflowKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	840 l/min
Special featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Charging indication; Soft touch handle
VacuumKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.2 kPa
Design featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Translucent dust chamber
Squeegee toolKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Dangerous goodsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for one	Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
Brand-specific featuresKnown for one	ADC Technology	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	122 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	161 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	400 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight (without accessories)Known for one	1.68 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons