Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Hoover SM156DPN 001 vs Philips FC6149/62 handheld vacuum Black, Orange Bagless

10specifications compared
4differ
6identical
27known for one product only

Key differences

The Hoover SM156DPN 001 has 2 min more runtime than the Philips FC6149/62 handheld vacuum Black, Orange Bagless (11 min vs 9 min). The Hoover SM156DPN 001 has 8 h more charging time than the Philips FC6149/62 handheld vacuum Black, Orange Bagless (16 h vs 8 h). The Hoover SM156DPN 001 has 4.8 V more battery voltage than the Philips FC6149/62 handheld vacuum Black, Orange Bagless (15.6 V vs 10.8 V). Product colour: White, Red on the Hoover SM156DPN 001, Black, Orange on the Philips FC6149/62 handheld vacuum Black, Orange Bagless.

Product colour
- SM156DPN 001:White, Red
- FC6149/62 handheld vacuum Black, Orange Bagless:Black, Orange
Runtime
- SM156DPN 001:11 min
- FC6149/62 handheld vacuum Black, Orange Bagless:9 min
Charging time
- SM156DPN 001:16 h
- FC6149/62 handheld vacuum Black, Orange Bagless:8 h
Battery voltage
- SM156DPN 001:15.6 V
- FC6149/62 handheld vacuum Black, Orange Bagless:10.8 V

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of SM156DPN 001, FC6149/62
37 specifications	A Hoover SM156DPN 001 View product	B Philips FC6149/62 handheld vacuum Black, Orange Bagless Model FC6149/62 View product
Performanceidentical
Cleaning type	Dry	Dry
Vacuum air filteringKnown for one	Micro	Unknown — not stated by the source
AirflowKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	950 l/min
Car careKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Air filtration stages quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Dirt separating methodKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Cyclonic
Noise levelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	81 dB
Design1 differ
Dust container type	Bagless	Bagless
Product colourDiffers	White, Red	Black, Orange
Dirt capacity dry	0.5 L	0.5 L
Wheels materialKnown for one	Rubber	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Accessory storageKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery low indicationKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomic handleKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Recharge indicator	Yes	Yes
Wall mountableKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Soft gripKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power3 differ
Power source	Battery	Battery
RuntimeDiffers	11 min	9 min
Charging timeDiffers	16 h	8 h
Battery voltageDiffers	15.6 V	10.8 V
Maximum input powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	120 W
Suction powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	22 AW
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	120 W
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for one	Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
Brand-specific featuresKnown for one	ADC Technology	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	167 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	230 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	442 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight (without accessories)Known for one	1.61 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Vacuum brushes includedKnown for one	Cleaning brush	Unknown — not stated by the source
Vacuum wand assemblyKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Brush toolKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Crevice tool	Yes	Yes
Charging baseKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Other featuresidentical
Squeegee toolKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
VacuumKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.2 kPa

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons