Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Hoover SC72DWG4 011 vs Philips MiniVac FC6150/51 handheld vacuum White Bagless

13specifications compared
10differ
3identical
19known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips MiniVac FC6150/51 handheld vacuum White Bagless has 0.2 L more dirt capacity dry than the Hoover SC72DWG4 011 (0.5 L vs 0.3 L). The Hoover SC72DWG4 011 has 3 min more runtime than the Philips MiniVac FC6150/51 handheld vacuum White Bagless (13 min vs 10 min). The Philips MiniVac FC6150/51 handheld vacuum White Bagless has 2 h more charging time than the Hoover SC72DWG4 011 (18 h vs 16 h). Cleaning type: Wet on the Hoover SC72DWG4 011, Dry on the Philips MiniVac FC6150/51 handheld vacuum White Bagless. Product colour: Green, Transparent on the Hoover SC72DWG4 011, White on the Philips MiniVac FC6150/51 handheld vacuum White Bagless.

Cleaning type
- SC72DWG4 011:Wet
- MiniVac FC6150/51 handheld vacuum White Bagless:Dry
Product colour
- SC72DWG4 011:Green, Transparent
- MiniVac FC6150/51 handheld vacuum White Bagless:White
Dirt capacity dry
- SC72DWG4 011:0.3 L
- MiniVac FC6150/51 handheld vacuum White Bagless:0.5 L
Runtime
- SC72DWG4 011:13 min
- MiniVac FC6150/51 handheld vacuum White Bagless:10 min
Charging time
- SC72DWG4 011:16 h
- MiniVac FC6150/51 handheld vacuum White Bagless:18 h
Battery voltage
- SC72DWG4 011:7.2 V
- MiniVac FC6150/51 handheld vacuum White Bagless:3.6 V
Width
- SC72DWG4 011:145 mm
- MiniVac FC6150/51 handheld vacuum White Bagless:133 mm
Depth
- SC72DWG4 011:120 mm
- MiniVac FC6150/51 handheld vacuum White Bagless:444 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of SC72DWG4 011, FC6150/51
32 specifications	A Hoover SC72DWG4 011 View product	B Philips MiniVac FC6150/51 handheld vacuum White Bagless Model FC6150/51 View product
Performance1 differ
Cleaning typeDiffers	Wet	Dry
Air filtration stages quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Dirt separating methodKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Cyclonic
Noise levelKnown for one	75 dB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Vacuum air filteringKnown for one	Micro	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design2 differ
Product colourDiffers	Green, Transparent	White
Dirt capacity dryDiffers	0.3 L	0.5 L
Housing materialKnown for one	Plastic	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power3 differ
RuntimeDiffers	13 min	10 min
Charging timeDiffers	16 h	18 h
Battery voltageDiffers	7.2 V	3.6 V
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	145 mm	133 mm
DepthDiffers	120 mm	444 mm
HeightDiffers	355 mm	109 mm
WeightDiffers	950 g	1 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Vacuum wand assemblyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Brush toolKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Crevice toolKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Other featuresidentical
Battery recharge timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	18 h
Dust capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.5 L
Squeegee toolKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Dangerous goodsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Packaging recyclability rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	90%
User manual recycled paperKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ergonomicsidentical
Washable filterKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery low indicationKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Removable filterKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Wall mountableKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
Brand-specific featuresKnown for one	ADC Technology	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons