Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Hoover SC72DWG4 011 vs Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6142/60

14specifications compared
11differ
3identical
20known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6142/60 has 1 dB more noise level than the Hoover SC72DWG4 011 (76 dB vs 75 dB). The Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6142/60 has 0.2 L more dirt capacity dry than the Hoover SC72DWG4 011 (0.5 L vs 0.3 L). The Hoover SC72DWG4 011 has 4 min more runtime than the Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6142/60 (13 min vs 9 min). Cleaning type: Wet on the Hoover SC72DWG4 011, Dry&wet on the Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6142/60. Product colour: Green, Transparent on the Hoover SC72DWG4 011, Blue on the Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6142/60.

Cleaning type
- SC72DWG4 011:Wet
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6142/60:Dry&wet
Noise level
- SC72DWG4 011:75 dB
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6142/60:76 dB
Product colour
- SC72DWG4 011:Green, Transparent
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6142/60:Blue
Dirt capacity dry
- SC72DWG4 011:0.3 L
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6142/60:0.5 L
Runtime
- SC72DWG4 011:13 min
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6142/60:9 min
Charging time
- SC72DWG4 011:16 h
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6142/60:18 h
Battery voltage
- SC72DWG4 011:7.2 V
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6142/60:4.8 V
Width
- SC72DWG4 011:145 mm
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6142/60:460 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of SC72DWG4 011, FC6142
34 specifications	A Hoover SC72DWG4 011 View product	B Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6142/60 Model FC6142 View product
Performance2 differ
Cleaning typeDiffers	Wet	Dry&wet
AirflowKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	530 l/s
Noise levelDiffers	75 dB	76 dB
Vacuum air filteringKnown for one	Micro	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design2 differ
Product colourDiffers	Green, Transparent	Blue
Dirt capacity dryDiffers	0.3 L	0.5 L
Liquid tank capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.11 L
Housing materialKnown for one	Plastic	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Washable filterKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery low indicationKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Removable filterKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power3 differ
Maximum input powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	56 W
RuntimeDiffers	13 min	9 min
Charging timeDiffers	16 h	18 h
Suction powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	6 AW
Battery voltageDiffers	7.2 V	4.8 V
Power sourceKnown for one	Battery	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	145 mm	460 mm
DepthDiffers	120 mm	160 mm
HeightDiffers	355 mm	160 mm
WeightDiffers	950 g	1.4 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	508 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	335 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	490 mm
Packaging contentidentical
Vacuum wand assemblyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Charging baseKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Crevice toolKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Other featuresidentical
Dust capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.5 L
VacuumKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.9 kPa
Squeegee toolKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
Brand-specific featuresKnown for one	ADC Technology	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons