Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Hoover SC72DWG4 011 vs Philips Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6048/01

5specifications compared
4differ
1identical
32known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6048/01 has 9 dB more noise level than the Hoover SC72DWG4 011 (84 dB vs 75 dB). The Philips Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6048/01 has 0.2 L more dirt capacity dry than the Hoover SC72DWG4 011 (0.5 L vs 0.3 L). Cleaning type: Wet on the Hoover SC72DWG4 011, Dry on the Philips Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6048/01. Product colour: Green, Transparent on the Hoover SC72DWG4 011, Blue, Brown on the Philips Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6048/01.

Cleaning type
- SC72DWG4 011:Wet
- Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6048/01:Dry
Noise level
- SC72DWG4 011:75 dB
- Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6048/01:84 dB
Product colour
- SC72DWG4 011:Green, Transparent
- Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6048/01:Blue, Brown
Dirt capacity dry
- SC72DWG4 011:0.3 L
- Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6048/01:0.5 L

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of SC72DWG4 011, FC6048/01
37 specifications	A Hoover SC72DWG4 011 View product	B Philips Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6048/01 Model FC6048/01 View product
Performance2 differ
Cleaning typeDiffers	Wet	Dry
Noise levelDiffers	75 dB	84 dB
Vacuum air filteringKnown for one	Micro	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design2 differ
Dust container type	Bagless	Bagless
Product colourDiffers	Green, Transparent	Blue, Brown
Dirt capacity dryDiffers	0.3 L	0.5 L
Housing materialKnown for one	Plastic	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Washable filterKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery low indicationKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Removable filterKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Wall mountableKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Integrated fold-out crevice toolKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Shoulder strapKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Poweridentical
Power sourceKnown for one	Battery	Unknown — not stated by the source
RuntimeKnown for one	13 min	Unknown — not stated by the source
Charging timeKnown for one	16 h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery voltageKnown for one	7.2 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum input powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	900 W
Suction powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	195 AW
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	900 W
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for one	Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
Brand-specific featuresKnown for one	ADC Technology	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	145 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	120 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	355 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one	950 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Squeegee toolKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cord clipKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Dust capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.5 L
Extension tubesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Flexible hoseKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Input powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	900 W
VacuumKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 kPa
FilterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2-stage
Packaging contentidentical
Vacuum brushes includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Hard floor brush
Vacuum wand assemblyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Brush toolKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons