Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Hoover SC72DWG4 011 vs MEDION MD 16322

18specifications compared
13differ
5identical
18known for one product only

Key differences

The MEDION MD 16322 has 0.1 L more dirt capacity dry than the Hoover SC72DWG4 011 (0.4 L vs 0.3 L). The MEDION MD 16322 has 2 min more runtime than the Hoover SC72DWG4 011 (15 min vs 13 min). The Hoover SC72DWG4 011 has 9.5 h more charging time than the MEDION MD 16322 (16 h vs 6.5 h). Only the MEDION MD 16322 has battery low indication. Cleaning type: Wet on the Hoover SC72DWG4 011, Dry&wet on the MEDION MD 16322.

Cleaning type
- SC72DWG4 011:Wet
- MD 16322:Dry&wet
Product colour
- SC72DWG4 011:Green, Transparent
- MD 16322:Black, Translucent
Dirt capacity dry
- SC72DWG4 011:0.3 L
- MD 16322:0.4 L
Housing material
- SC72DWG4 011:Plastic
- MD 16322:Polypropylene (PP)
Battery low indication
- SC72DWG4 011:No
- MD 16322:Yes
Runtime
- SC72DWG4 011:13 min
- MD 16322:15 min
Charging time
- SC72DWG4 011:16 h
- MD 16322:6.5 h
Battery voltage
- SC72DWG4 011:7.2 V
- MD 16322:7.4 V

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of SC72DWG4 011, MD 16322
36 specifications	A Hoover SC72DWG4 011 View product	B MEDION MD 16322 View product
Performance1 differ
Cleaning typeDiffers	Wet	Dry&wet
Motor powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	45 W
Filtration systemKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Dirt separating methodKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Cyclonic/filtering
Noise levelKnown for one	75 dB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Vacuum air filteringKnown for one	Micro	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design3 differ
Product colourDiffers	Green, Transparent	Black, Translucent
Dirt capacity dryDiffers	0.3 L	0.4 L
Dirt capacity wetKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.15 L
Housing materialDiffers	Plastic	Polypropylene (PP)
Ergonomics1 differ
Battery low indicationDiffers	No	Yes
Recharge indicatorKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power3 differ
Maximum input powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	45 W
RuntimeDiffers	13 min	15 min
Charging timeDiffers	16 h	6.5 h
Runtime with motorized brush (high speed)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	15 min
Battery capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1300 Ah
Battery voltageDiffers	7.2 V	7.4 V
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	45 W
Battery1 differ
Battery technologyDiffers	Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)	Lithium
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	145 mm	135 mm
DepthDiffers	120 mm	420 mm
HeightDiffers	355 mm	105 mm
WeightDiffers	950 g	940 g
Packaging contentidentical
Vacuum wand assemblyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Charging baseKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Car plugKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Crevice toolKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
ManualKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Featuresidentical
Brand-specific featuresKnown for one	ADC Technology	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Squeegee toolKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons