Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Hoover SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless vs Philips Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6048/01

6specifications compared
2differ
4identical
28known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6048/01 has 0.2 L more dirt capacity dry than the Hoover SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless (0.5 L vs 0.3 L). Product colour: Green, White on the Hoover SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless, Blue, Brown on the Philips Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6048/01.

Product colour
- SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless:Green, White
- Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6048/01:Blue, Brown
Dirt capacity dry
- SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless:0.3 L
- Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6048/01:0.5 L

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of SC72DWG, FC6048/01
34 specifications	A Hoover SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless Model SC72DWG View product	B Philips Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6048/01 Model FC6048/01 View product
Performanceidentical
Cleaning type	Dry	Dry
FilteringKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Noise levelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	84 dB
Design2 differ
Dust container type	Bagless	Bagless
Product colourDiffers	Green, White	Blue, Brown
Dirt capacity dryDiffers	0.3 L	0.5 L
Ergonomicsidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Integrated fold-out crevice toolKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Shoulder strapKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Poweridentical
RuntimeKnown for one	18 min	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of batteries supportedKnown for one	6	Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery voltageKnown for one	7.2 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum input powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	900 W
Suction powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	195 AW
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	900 W
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for one	Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	120 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	355 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	145 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one	900 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package weightKnown for one	1.7 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Vacuum wand assembly	No	No
Dust bag includedKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Brush tool	Yes	Yes
Crevice toolKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Vacuum brushes includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Hard floor brush
Other featuresidentical
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	185 x 385 x 130 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cord clipKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Dust capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.5 L
Extension tubesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Flexible hoseKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Input powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	900 W
VacuumKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 kPa
FilterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2-stage

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons