Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Hoover SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless vs Hoover SJ4000DWB6/1 011

9specifications compared
5differ
4identical
28known for one product only

Key differences

The Hoover SJ4000DWB6/1 011 has 4.8 V more battery voltage than the Hoover SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless (12 V vs 7.2 V). The Hoover SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless has 16 mm more width than the Hoover SJ4000DWB6/1 011 (120 mm vs 104 mm). The Hoover SJ4000DWB6/1 011 has 272 mm more height than the Hoover SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless (417 mm vs 145 mm). Product colour: Green, White on the Hoover SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless, Black on the Hoover SJ4000DWB6/1 011.

Product colour
- SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless:Green, White
- SJ4000DWB6/1 011:Black
Battery voltage
- SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless:7.2 V
- SJ4000DWB6/1 011:12 V
Width
- SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless:120 mm
- SJ4000DWB6/1 011:104 mm
Height
- SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless:145 mm
- SJ4000DWB6/1 011:417 mm
Weight
- SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless:900 g
- SJ4000DWB6/1 011:640 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of SC72DWG, SJ4000DWB6/1 011
37 specifications	A Hoover SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless Model SC72DWG View product	B Hoover SJ4000DWB6/1 011 View product
Performanceidentical
Cleaning type	Dry	Dry
Car careKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Vacuum air filteringKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Micro
FilteringKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Dust container type	Bagless	Bagless
Product colourDiffers	Green, White	Black
Dirt capacity dry	0.3 L	0.3 L
Ergonomicsidentical
Washable filterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Accessory storageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Battery low indicationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Ergonomic handleKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Wall mountableKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power sourceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Cigar lighter
Battery voltageDiffers	7.2 V	12 V
RuntimeKnown for one	18 min	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of batteries supportedKnown for one	6	Unknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
Brand-specific featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Batteryidentical
Battery level indicatorKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Battery technologyKnown for one	Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	120 mm	104 mm
HeightDiffers	145 mm	417 mm
WeightDiffers	900 g	640 g
Weight (without accessories)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	640 g
DepthKnown for one	355 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	115 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	112 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	435 mm
Package weightKnown for one	1.7 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Crevice tool	Yes	Yes
Quantity per packKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 pc(s)
Vacuum wand assemblyKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dust bag includedKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Brush toolKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Dust capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.3 L
Squeegee toolKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	185 x 385 x 130 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons