Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Hoover Jazz handheld vacuum Red, White Bagless vs Philips Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6048/01

7specifications compared
2differ
5identical
34known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6048/01 has 7 dB more noise level than the Hoover Jazz handheld vacuum Red, White Bagless (84 dB vs 77 dB). Product colour: Red, White on the Hoover Jazz handheld vacuum Red, White Bagless, Blue, Brown on the Philips Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6048/01.

Noise level
- Jazz handheld vacuum Red, White Bagless:77 dB
- Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6048/01:84 dB
Product colour
- Jazz handheld vacuum Red, White Bagless:Red, White
- Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6048/01:Blue, Brown

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Jazz, FC6048/01
41 specifications	A Hoover Jazz handheld vacuum Red, White Bagless Model Jazz View product	B Philips Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6048/01 Model FC6048/01 View product
Performance1 differ
Cleaning type	Dry	Dry
Dirt separating methodKnown for one	Filtering	Unknown — not stated by the source
HEPA classKnown for one	HEPA 10	Unknown — not stated by the source
Noise levelDiffers	77 dB	84 dB
Vacuum air filteringKnown for one	HEPA	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Dust container type	Bagless	Bagless
Product colourDiffers	Red, White	Blue, Brown
Dirt capacity dry	0.5 L	0.5 L
Ergonomicsidentical
Battery low indicationKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Integrated fold-out crevice toolKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Shoulder strapKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Poweridentical
RuntimeKnown for one	18 min	Unknown — not stated by the source
Charging timeKnown for one	16 h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of batteries supportedKnown for one	13	Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery voltageKnown for one	15.6 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery typeKnown for one	AA	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum input powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	900 W
Suction powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	195 AW
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	900 W
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for one	Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	160 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	120 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	400 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one	1.61 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	167 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	442 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	230 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	2.2 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Vacuum wand assembly	No	No
Brush tool	Yes	Yes
Crevice toolKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Vacuum brushes includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Hard floor brush
Technical detailsidentical
Filter typeKnown for one	HEPA	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Cord clipKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Dust capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.5 L
Extension tubesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Flexible hoseKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Input powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	900 W
VacuumKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 kPa
FilterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2-stage

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons