Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Hisense HFC743169BKA handheld vacuum Black Bagless vs Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6142/60

Add a product
  • 21specifications compared
  • 18differ
  • 3identical
  • 12known for one product only

Key differences

The Hisense HFC743169BKA handheld vacuum Black Bagless has 7 dB more noise level than the Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6142/60 (83 dB vs 76 dB). The Hisense HFC743169BKA handheld vacuum Black Bagless has 0.1 L more dirt capacity dry than the Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6142/60 (0.6 L vs 0.5 L). The Hisense HFC743169BKA handheld vacuum Black Bagless has 0.49 L more liquid tank capacity than the Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6142/60 (0.6 L vs 0.11 L). Airflow: 15 l/min on the Hisense HFC743169BKA handheld vacuum Black Bagless, 530 l/s on the Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6142/60. Product colour: Black on the Hisense HFC743169BKA handheld vacuum Black Bagless, Blue on the Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6142/60.

  • Airflow
    • HFC743169BKA handheld vacuum Black Bagless:15 l/min
    • MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6142/60:530 l/s
  • Noise level
    • HFC743169BKA handheld vacuum Black Bagless:83 dB
    • MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6142/60:76 dB
  • Product colour
    • HFC743169BKA handheld vacuum Black Bagless:Black
    • MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6142/60:Blue
  • Dirt capacity dry
    • HFC743169BKA handheld vacuum Black Bagless:0.6 L
    • MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6142/60:0.5 L
  • Liquid tank capacity
    • HFC743169BKA handheld vacuum Black Bagless:0.6 L
    • MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6142/60:0.11 L
  • Maximum input power
    • HFC743169BKA handheld vacuum Black Bagless:500 W
    • MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6142/60:56 W
  • Runtime
    • HFC743169BKA handheld vacuum Black Bagless:25 min
    • MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6142/60:9 min
  • Charging time
    • HFC743169BKA handheld vacuum Black Bagless:5 h
    • MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6142/60:18 h

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of HFC743169BKA, FC6142
33 specifications
Performance2 differ
Cleaning typeDry&wetDry&wet
Cleaning surfacesKnown for oneCarpet, Hard floorUnknown — not stated by the source
AirflowDiffers15 l/min530 l/s
Noise levelDiffers83 dB76 dB
Design3 differ
Dust container typeBaglessBagless
Product colourDiffersBlackBlue
Dirt capacity dryDiffers0.6 L0.5 L
Liquid tank capacityDiffers0.6 L0.11 L
Housing materialKnown for onePlasticUnknown — not stated by the source
Power5 differ
Power sourceKnown for oneBatteryUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum input powerDiffers500 W56 W
RuntimeDiffers25 min9 min
Charging timeDiffers5 h18 h
Suction powerDiffers90 AW6 AW
Battery capacityKnown for one5 AhUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of batteries supportedKnown for one6Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery voltageDiffers21.6 V4.8 V
Battery1 differ
Battery technologyDiffersLithium-Ion (Li-Ion)Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers280 mm460 mm
DepthDiffers300 mm160 mm
HeightDiffers1130 mm160 mm
WeightDiffers9.5 kg1.4 kg
Packaging data3 differ
Package widthDiffers667 mm508 mm
Package depthDiffers271 mm335 mm
Package heightDiffers452 mm490 mm
Package weightKnown for one14.6 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Vacuum brushes includedKnown for oneHard floor brushUnknown — not stated by the source
Charging baseYesYes
Vacuum wand assemblyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Crevice toolKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ergonomicsidentical
Wall mountableKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Other featuresidentical
Dust capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.5 L
VacuumKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.9 kPa

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons