Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Gorenje MVC72HGA handheld vacuum Grey Bagless vs Hoover SC72DWG4 011

Add a product
  • 13specifications compared
  • 11differ
  • 2identical
  • 19known for one product only

Key differences

The Gorenje MVC72HGA handheld vacuum Grey Bagless has 3 dB more noise level than the Hoover SC72DWG4 011 (78 dB vs 75 dB). The Hoover SC72DWG4 011 has 0.2 L more dirt capacity dry than the Gorenje MVC72HGA handheld vacuum Grey Bagless (0.3 L vs 0.1 L). The Hoover SC72DWG4 011 has 1 min more runtime than the Gorenje MVC72HGA handheld vacuum Grey Bagless (13 min vs 12 min). Cleaning type: Dry on the Gorenje MVC72HGA handheld vacuum Grey Bagless, Wet on the Hoover SC72DWG4 011. Vacuum air filtering: HEPA on the Gorenje MVC72HGA handheld vacuum Grey Bagless, Micro on the Hoover SC72DWG4 011.

  • Cleaning type
    • MVC72HGA handheld vacuum Grey Bagless:Dry
    • SC72DWG4 011:Wet
  • Noise level
    • MVC72HGA handheld vacuum Grey Bagless:78 dB
    • SC72DWG4 011:75 dB
  • Vacuum air filtering
    • MVC72HGA handheld vacuum Grey Bagless:HEPA
    • SC72DWG4 011:Micro
  • Product colour
    • MVC72HGA handheld vacuum Grey Bagless:Grey
    • SC72DWG4 011:Green, Transparent
  • Dirt capacity dry
    • MVC72HGA handheld vacuum Grey Bagless:0.1 L
    • SC72DWG4 011:0.3 L
  • Runtime
    • MVC72HGA handheld vacuum Grey Bagless:12 min
    • SC72DWG4 011:13 min
  • Charging time
    • MVC72HGA handheld vacuum Grey Bagless:4 h
    • SC72DWG4 011:16 h
  • Width
    • MVC72HGA handheld vacuum Grey Bagless:66 mm
    • SC72DWG4 011:145 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of MVC72HGA, SC72DWG4 011
32 specifications
Performance3 differ
Cleaning typeDiffersDryWet
AirflowKnown for one480 l/minUnknown — not stated by the source
Dirt separating methodKnown for oneFilteringUnknown — not stated by the source
Noise levelDiffers78 dB75 dB
Vacuum air filteringDiffersHEPAMicro
Design2 differ
Dust container typeBaglessBagless
Product colourDiffersGreyGreen, Transparent
Dirt capacity dryDiffers0.1 L0.3 L
Housing materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePlastic
Ergonomicsidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for oneChargingUnknown — not stated by the source
Washable filterKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Battery low indicationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Removable filterKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Wall mountableKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power2 differ
Power sourceBatteryBattery
Maximum input powerKnown for one70, 10Unknown — not stated by the source
RuntimeDiffers12 min13 min
Charging timeDiffers4 h16 h
Number of battery cellsKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source7.2 V
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers66 mm145 mm
DepthDiffers66 mm120 mm
HeightDiffers295 mm355 mm
WeightDiffers700 g950 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one366 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one112 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one92 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one900 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Vacuum wand assemblyKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)
Featuresidentical
Brand-specific featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceADC Technology
Other featuresidentical
Squeegee toolKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons