Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Gorenje MVC72FW handheld vacuum Black, White Bagless vs Philips FC6142/71 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless

Add a product
  • 18specifications compared
  • 14differ
  • 4identical
  • 16known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips FC6142/71 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless has 525 l/min more airflow than the Gorenje MVC72FW handheld vacuum Black, White Bagless (530 l/min vs 5 l/min). The Gorenje MVC72FW handheld vacuum Black, White Bagless has 4 dB more noise level than the Philips FC6142/71 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless (80 dB vs 76 dB). The Philips FC6142/71 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless has 0.1 L more dirt capacity dry than the Gorenje MVC72FW handheld vacuum Black, White Bagless (0.5 L vs 0.4 L). Product colour: Black, White on the Gorenje MVC72FW handheld vacuum Black, White Bagless, Blue on the Philips FC6142/71 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless. Battery technology: Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion) on the Gorenje MVC72FW handheld vacuum Black, White Bagless, Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH) on the Philips FC6142/71 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless.

  • Airflow
    • MVC72FW handheld vacuum Black, White Bagless:5 l/min
    • FC6142/71 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless:530 l/min
  • Noise level
    • MVC72FW handheld vacuum Black, White Bagless:80 dB
    • FC6142/71 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless:76 dB
  • Product colour
    • MVC72FW handheld vacuum Black, White Bagless:Black, White
    • FC6142/71 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless:Blue
  • Dirt capacity dry
    • MVC72FW handheld vacuum Black, White Bagless:0.4 L
    • FC6142/71 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless:0.5 L
  • Runtime
    • MVC72FW handheld vacuum Black, White Bagless:14 min
    • FC6142/71 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless:9 min
  • Battery voltage
    • MVC72FW handheld vacuum Black, White Bagless:7.2 V
    • FC6142/71 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless:4.8 V
  • Battery technology
    • MVC72FW handheld vacuum Black, White Bagless:Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)
    • FC6142/71 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless:Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)
  • Width
    • MVC72FW handheld vacuum Black, White Bagless:405 mm
    • FC6142/71 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless:460 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of MVC72FW, FC6142/71
34 specifications
Performance2 differ
Motor powerKnown for one55 WUnknown — not stated by the source
AirflowDiffers5 l/min530 l/min
Noise levelDiffers80 dB76 dB
Design2 differ
Product colourDiffersBlack, WhiteBlue
Dirt capacity dryDiffers0.4 L0.5 L
Dirt capacity wetKnown for one0.4 LUnknown — not stated by the source
Housing materialKnown for onePlasticUnknown — not stated by the source
Liquid tank capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.11 L
Ergonomicsidentical
Indication lightKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Recharge indicatorKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Wall mountableKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power2 differ
RuntimeDiffers14 min9 min
Battery voltageDiffers7.2 V4.8 V
Battery typeKnown for oneBuilt-inUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum input powerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source56 W
Charging timeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source18 h
Suction powerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source76 AW
Battery1 differ
Battery technologyDiffersLithium-Ion (Li-Ion)Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers405 mm460 mm
DepthDiffers120 mm160 mm
HeightDiffers115 mm160 mm
WeightDiffers700 g1.4 kg
Packaging data3 differ
Package widthDiffers440 mm508 mm
Package depthDiffers120 mm335 mm
Package heightDiffers150 mm490 mm
Package weightKnown for one1.3 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Vacuum wand assemblyKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Charging baseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Crevice toolKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Other featuresidentical
VacuumKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.9 kPa

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons