Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Electrolux ZB6114IGM handheld vacuum Grey Bagless vs Philips MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless

12specifications compared
5differ
7identical
20known for one product only

Key differences

The Electrolux ZB6114IGM handheld vacuum Grey Bagless has 15 min more runtime than the Philips MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless (24 min vs 9 min). The Philips MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless has 4 h more charging time than the Electrolux ZB6114IGM handheld vacuum Grey Bagless (8 h vs 4 h). The Electrolux ZB6114IGM handheld vacuum Grey Bagless has 3.6 V more battery voltage than the Philips MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless (14.4 V vs 10.8 V). Product colour: Grey on the Electrolux ZB6114IGM handheld vacuum Grey Bagless, Champagne, Green on the Philips MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless. Weight: 1.13 kg on the Electrolux ZB6114IGM handheld vacuum Grey Bagless, 800 g on the Philips MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless.

Product colour
- ZB6114IGM handheld vacuum Grey Bagless:Grey
- MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless:Champagne, Green
Runtime
- ZB6114IGM handheld vacuum Grey Bagless:24 min
- MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless:9 min
Charging time
- ZB6114IGM handheld vacuum Grey Bagless:4 h
- MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless:8 h
Battery voltage
- ZB6114IGM handheld vacuum Grey Bagless:14.4 V
- MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless:10.8 V
Weight
- ZB6114IGM handheld vacuum Grey Bagless:1.13 kg
- MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless:800 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ZB6114IGM, FC6148/71
32 specifications	A Electrolux ZB6114IGM handheld vacuum Grey Bagless Model ZB6114IGM View product	B Philips MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless Model FC6148/71 View product
Performanceidentical
Cleaning type	Dry	Dry
AirflowKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	950 l/min
Dirt separating method	Cyclonic	Cyclonic
Noise levelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	81 dB
Filtration systemKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Dust container type	Bagless	Bagless
Product colourDiffers	Grey	Champagne, Green
Dirt capacity dry	0.5 L	0.5 L
Built-in displayKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Soft grip	Yes	Yes
Battery low indicationKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Integrated fold-out crevice toolKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power3 differ
Maximum input powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 W
RuntimeDiffers	24 min	9 min
Charging timeDiffers	4 h	8 h
Suction powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	22 AW
Battery voltageDiffers	14.4 V	10.8 V
Power sourceKnown for one	Battery	Unknown — not stated by the source
Batteryidentical
Battery technology	Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)	Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	1.13 kg	800 g
WidthKnown for one	136 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	419 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	171 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	160 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	460 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	160 mm
Number of packagesKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Vacuum wand assembly	No	No
Charging baseKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Brush toolKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Crevice toolKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Other featuresidentical
VacuumKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.3 kPa

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons