Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless vs Philips FC6149/62 handheld vacuum Black, Orange Bagless

10specifications compared
4differ
6identical
22known for one product only

Key differences

The Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless has 4 min more runtime than the Philips FC6149/62 handheld vacuum Black, Orange Bagless (13 min vs 9 min). The Philips FC6149/62 handheld vacuum Black, Orange Bagless has 4 h more charging time than the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless (8 h vs 4 h). The Philips FC6149/62 handheld vacuum Black, Orange Bagless has 3.6 V more battery voltage than the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless (10.8 V vs 7.2 V). Product colour: Red on the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless, Black, Orange on the Philips FC6149/62 handheld vacuum Black, Orange Bagless.

Product colour
- ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:Red
- FC6149/62 handheld vacuum Black, Orange Bagless:Black, Orange
Runtime
- ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:13 min
- FC6149/62 handheld vacuum Black, Orange Bagless:9 min
Charging time
- ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:4 h
- FC6149/62 handheld vacuum Black, Orange Bagless:8 h
Battery voltage
- ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:7.2 V
- FC6149/62 handheld vacuum Black, Orange Bagless:10.8 V

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ZB6106WR, FC6149/62
32 specifications	A Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless Model ZB6106WR View product	B Philips FC6149/62 handheld vacuum Black, Orange Bagless Model FC6149/62 View product
Performanceidentical
Filtration systemKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
AirflowKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	950 l/min
Car careKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Air filtration stages quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Noise levelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	81 dB
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffers	Red	Black, Orange
Built-in displayKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Battery low indicationKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Integrated fold-out crevice toolKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Recharge indicatorKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power3 differ
RuntimeDiffers	13 min	9 min
Charging timeDiffers	4 h	8 h
Battery voltageDiffers	7.2 V	10.8 V
Maximum input powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	120 W
Suction powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	22 AW
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	120 W
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for one	Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	136 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	419 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	171 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one	1.03 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Number of packagesKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Vacuum wand assemblyKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Charging baseKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Crevice toolKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Other featuresidentical
VacuumKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.2 kPa

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons