Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless vs Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6149/01

9specifications compared
4differ
5identical
27known for one product only

Key differences

The Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless has 2 min more runtime than the Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6149/01 (13 min vs 11 min). The Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6149/01 has 14 h more charging time than the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless (18 h vs 4 h). The Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6149/01 has 4.8 V more battery voltage than the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless (12 V vs 7.2 V). Product colour: Red on the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless, Black on the Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6149/01.

Product colour
- ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:Red
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6149/01:Black
Runtime
- ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:13 min
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6149/01:11 min
Charging time
- ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:4 h
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6149/01:18 h
Battery voltage
- ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:7.2 V
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6149/01:12 V

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ZB6106WR, FC6149/01
36 specifications	A Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless Model ZB6106WR View product	B Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6149/01 Model FC6149/01 View product
Performanceidentical
Cleaning type	Dry	Dry
AirflowKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	840 l/min
Air filtration stages quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Dirt separating method	Cyclonic	Cyclonic
Noise levelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	81 dB
Filtration systemKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Dust container type	Bagless	Bagless
Product colourDiffers	Red	Black
Dirt capacity dry	0.5 L	0.5 L
Built-in displayKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Recharge indicatorKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Battery low indicationKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Integrated fold-out crevice toolKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Soft gripKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power3 differ
Maximum input powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	120 W
RuntimeDiffers	13 min	11 min
Charging timeDiffers	4 h	18 h
Suction powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	22 AW
Battery voltageDiffers	7.2 V	12 V
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	120 W
Power sourceKnown for one	Battery	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Vacuum wand assembly	No	No
Charging baseKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Other featuresidentical
Battery recharge timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	18 h
Dust capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.5 L
Maximum airflowKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	840 l/min
Special featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Charging indication; Soft touch handle
VacuumKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.2 kPa
Design featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Translucent dust chamber
Technical detailsidentical
Dangerous goodsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for one	Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	136 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	419 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	171 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one	1.03 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Number of packagesKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons