Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless vs Philips MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless

12specifications compared
5differ
7identical
20known for one product only

Key differences

The Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless has 4 min more runtime than the Philips MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless (13 min vs 9 min). The Philips MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless has 4 h more charging time than the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless (8 h vs 4 h). The Philips MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless has 3.6 V more battery voltage than the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless (10.8 V vs 7.2 V). Product colour: Red on the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless, Champagne, Green on the Philips MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless. Weight: 1.03 kg on the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless, 800 g on the Philips MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless.

Product colour
- ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:Red
- MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless:Champagne, Green
Runtime
- ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:13 min
- MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless:9 min
Charging time
- ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:4 h
- MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless:8 h
Battery voltage
- ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:7.2 V
- MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless:10.8 V
Weight
- ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:1.03 kg
- MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless:800 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ZB6106WR, FC6148/71
32 specifications	A Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless Model ZB6106WR View product	B Philips MiniVac FC6148/71 handheld vacuum Champagne, Green Bagless Model FC6148/71 View product
Performanceidentical
AirflowKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	950 l/min
Noise levelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	81 dB
Filtration systemKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffers	Red	Champagne, Green
Built-in displayKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Battery low indicationKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Integrated fold-out crevice toolKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power3 differ
Maximum input powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 W
RuntimeDiffers	13 min	9 min
Charging timeDiffers	4 h	8 h
Suction powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	22 AW
Battery voltageDiffers	7.2 V	10.8 V
Power sourceKnown for one	Battery	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	1.03 kg	800 g
WidthKnown for one	136 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	419 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	171 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	160 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	460 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	160 mm
Number of packagesKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Charging baseKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Brush toolKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Crevice toolKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Other featuresidentical
VacuumKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.3 kPa

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons