Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless vs Hoover SM156WDP4 011

15specifications compared
12differ
3identical
20known for one product only

Key differences

The Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless has 0.3 L more dirt capacity dry than the Hoover SM156WDP4 011 (0.5 L vs 0.2 L). The Hoover SM156WDP4 011 has 4 min more runtime than the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless (17 min vs 13 min). The Hoover SM156WDP4 011 has 12 h more charging time than the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless (16 h vs 4 h). Only the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless has battery low indication. Cleaning type: Dry on the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless, Dry&wet on the Hoover SM156WDP4 011.

Cleaning type
- ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:Dry
- SM156WDP4 011:Dry&wet
Product colour
- ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:Red
- SM156WDP4 011:Blue, White
Dirt capacity dry
- ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:0.5 L
- SM156WDP4 011:0.2 L
Battery low indication
- ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:Yes
- SM156WDP4 011:No
Runtime
- ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:13 min
- SM156WDP4 011:17 min
Charging time
- ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:4 h
- SM156WDP4 011:16 h
Battery voltage
- ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:7.2 V
- SM156WDP4 011:15.6 V
Battery technology
- ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)
- SM156WDP4 011:Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ZB6106WR, SM156WDP4 011
35 specifications	A Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless Model ZB6106WR View product	B Hoover SM156WDP4 011 View product
Performance1 differ
Cleaning typeDiffers	Dry	Dry&wet
Vacuum air filteringKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Micro
Filtration systemKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dirt separating methodKnown for one	Cyclonic	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design2 differ
Dust container type	Bagless	Bagless
Product colourDiffers	Red	Blue, White
Dirt capacity dryDiffers	0.5 L	0.2 L
Liquid tank capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.2 L
Built-in displayKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomics1 differ
Washable filterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Accessory storageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Battery low indicationDiffers	Yes	No
Ergonomic handleKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Removable filterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Wall mountableKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Integrated fold-out crevice toolKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Soft gripKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power3 differ
Power source	Battery	Battery
RuntimeDiffers	13 min	17 min
Charging timeDiffers	4 h	16 h
Battery voltageDiffers	7.2 V	15.6 V
Battery typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	NiMH
Battery1 differ
Battery technologyDiffers	Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)	Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)
Featuresidentical
Brand-specific featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	136 mm	400 mm
DepthDiffers	419 mm	122 mm
HeightDiffers	171 mm	161 mm
WeightDiffers	1.03 kg	1.42 kg
Weight (without accessories)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.42 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	230 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	167 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	442 mm
Number of packagesKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Vacuum wand assembly	No	No
Other featuresidentical
Squeegee toolKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons