Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless vs Hoover SM156WD4 011

Key differences

The Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless has 0.3 L more dirt capacity dry than the Hoover SM156WD4 011 (0.5 L vs 0.2 L). The Hoover SM156WD4 011 has 4 min more runtime than the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless (17 min vs 13 min). The Hoover SM156WD4 011 has 12 h more charging time than the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless (16 h vs 4 h). Cleaning type: Dry on the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless, Dry&wet on the Hoover SM156WD4 011. Dirt separating method: Cyclonic on the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless, Filtering on the Hoover SM156WD4 011.

• Cleaning type
  • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:Dry
  • SM156WD4 011:Dry&wet
• Dirt separating method
  • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:Cyclonic
  • SM156WD4 011:Filtering
• Product colour
  • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:Red
  • SM156WD4 011:Blue
• Dirt capacity dry
  • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:0.5 L
  • SM156WD4 011:0.2 L
• Runtime
  • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:13 min
  • SM156WD4 011:17 min
• Charging time
  • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:4 h
  • SM156WD4 011:16 h
• Battery voltage
  • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:7.2 V
  • SM156WD4 011:15.6 V
• Battery technology
  • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)
  • SM156WD4 011:Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)