Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless vs Hoover SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless

Add a product
  • 12specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 4identical
  • 17known for one product only

Key differences

The Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless has 0.2 L more dirt capacity dry than the Hoover SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless (0.5 L vs 0.3 L). The Hoover SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless has 5 min more runtime than the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless (18 min vs 13 min). The Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless has 16 mm more width than the Hoover SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless (136 mm vs 120 mm). Product colour: Red on the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless, Green, White on the Hoover SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless. Battery technology: Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion) on the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless, Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH) on the Hoover SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless.

  • Product colour
    • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:Red
    • SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless:Green, White
  • Dirt capacity dry
    • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:0.5 L
    • SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless:0.3 L
  • Runtime
    • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:13 min
    • SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless:18 min
  • Battery technology
    • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)
    • SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless:Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)
  • Width
    • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:136 mm
    • SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless:120 mm
  • Depth
    • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:419 mm
    • SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless:355 mm
  • Height
    • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:171 mm
    • SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless:145 mm
  • Weight
    • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:1.03 kg
    • SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless:900 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of ZB6106WR, SC72DWG
29 specifications
Performanceidentical
Filtration systemKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Dirt separating methodKnown for oneCyclonicUnknown — not stated by the source
FilteringKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Design2 differ
Product colourDiffersRedGreen, White
Dirt capacity dryDiffers0.5 L0.3 L
Built-in displayKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Battery low indicationKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Integrated fold-out crevice toolKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Soft gripKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power1 differ
Power sourceKnown for oneBatteryUnknown — not stated by the source
RuntimeDiffers13 min18 min
Charging timeKnown for one4 hUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of batteries supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source6
Battery1 differ
Battery technologyDiffersLithium-Ion (Li-Ion)Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers136 mm120 mm
DepthDiffers419 mm355 mm
HeightDiffers171 mm145 mm
WeightDiffers1.03 kg900 g
Packaging dataidentical
Number of packagesKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.7 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Dust bag includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Brush toolKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Crevice toolKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Other featuresidentical
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source185 x 385 x 130 mm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons