Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless vs Hoover SC72DWG4 011

Key differences

The Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless has 0.2 L more dirt capacity dry than the Hoover SC72DWG4 011 (0.5 L vs 0.3 L). The Hoover SC72DWG4 011 has 12 h more charging time than the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless (16 h vs 4 h). The Hoover SC72DWG4 011 has 9 mm more width than the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless (145 mm vs 136 mm). Only the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless has battery low indication. Cleaning type: Dry on the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless, Wet on the Hoover SC72DWG4 011.

• Cleaning type
  • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:Dry
  • SC72DWG4 011:Wet
• Product colour
  • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:Red
  • SC72DWG4 011:Green, Transparent
• Dirt capacity dry
  • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:0.5 L
  • SC72DWG4 011:0.3 L
• Battery low indication
  • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:Yes
  • SC72DWG4 011:No
• Charging time
  • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:4 h
  • SC72DWG4 011:16 h
• Battery technology
  • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)
  • SC72DWG4 011:Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)
• Width
  • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:136 mm
  • SC72DWG4 011:145 mm
• Depth
  • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:419 mm
  • SC72DWG4 011:120 mm