Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Electrolux ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless vs Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6149/01

10specifications compared
4differ
6identical
25known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6149/01 has 3 min more runtime than the Electrolux ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless (11 min vs 8 min). The Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6149/01 has 2 h more charging time than the Electrolux ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless (18 h vs 16 h). The Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6149/01 has 8.4 V more battery voltage than the Electrolux ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless (12 V vs 3.6 V). Product colour: White on the Electrolux ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless, Black on the Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6149/01.

Product colour
- ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless:White
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6149/01:Black
Runtime
- ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless:8 min
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6149/01:11 min
Charging time
- ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless:16 h
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6149/01:18 h
Battery voltage
- ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless:3.6 V
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6149/01:12 V

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ZB5003SW, FC6149/01
35 specifications	A Electrolux ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless Model ZB5003SW View product	B Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6149/01 Model FC6149/01 View product
Performanceidentical
AirflowKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	840 l/min
Noise levelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	81 dB
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffers	White	Black
Ergonomicsidentical
Recharge indicatorKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Washable filterKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery low indicationKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Removable filterKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power3 differ
Maximum input powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	120 W
RuntimeDiffers	8 min	11 min
Charging timeDiffers	16 h	18 h
Suction powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	22 AW
Battery voltageDiffers	3.6 V	12 V
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	120 W
Power sourceKnown for one	Battery	Unknown — not stated by the source
Runtime with motorized brush (high speed)Known for one	8 min	Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery capacityKnown for one	1.3 Ah	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Charging baseKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Other featuresidentical
Battery recharge timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	18 h
Dust capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.5 L
Maximum airflowKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	840 l/min
Special featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Charging indication; Soft touch handle
VacuumKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.2 kPa
Design featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Translucent dust chamber
Technical detailsidentical
Dangerous goodsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for one	Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	127 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	410 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	137 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one	950 g	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons