Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Electrolux ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless vs Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless

Add a product
  • 16specifications compared
  • 9differ
  • 7identical
  • 10known for one product only

Key differences

The Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless has 5 min more runtime than the Electrolux ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless (13 min vs 8 min). The Electrolux ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless has 12 h more charging time than the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless (16 h vs 4 h). The Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless has 3.6 V more battery voltage than the Electrolux ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless (7.2 V vs 3.6 V). Product colour: White on the Electrolux ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless, Red on the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless. Battery technology: Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH) on the Electrolux ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless, Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion) on the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless.

  • Product colour
    • ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless:White
    • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:Red
  • Runtime
    • ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless:8 min
    • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:13 min
  • Charging time
    • ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless:16 h
    • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:4 h
  • Battery voltage
    • ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless:3.6 V
    • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:7.2 V
  • Battery technology
    • ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless:Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)
    • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)
  • Width
    • ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless:127 mm
    • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:136 mm
  • Depth
    • ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless:410 mm
    • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:419 mm
  • Height
    • ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless:137 mm
    • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:171 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of ZB5003SW, ZB6106WR
26 specifications
Performanceidentical
Cleaning typeDryDry
Air filtration stages quantityKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Dirt separating methodCyclonicCyclonic
Filtration systemKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Design1 differ
Dust container typeBaglessBagless
Product colourDiffersWhiteRed
Dirt capacity dry0.5 L0.5 L
Built-in displayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Ergonomicsidentical
Washable filterKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Battery low indicationYesYes
Removable filterKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Integrated fold-out crevice toolKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Soft gripKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power3 differ
Power sourceBatteryBattery
RuntimeDiffers8 min13 min
Charging timeDiffers16 h4 h
Runtime with motorized brush (high speed)Known for one8 minUnknown — not stated by the source
Battery capacityKnown for one1.3 AhUnknown — not stated by the source
Battery voltageDiffers3.6 V7.2 V
Battery1 differ
Battery technologyDiffersNickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers127 mm136 mm
DepthDiffers410 mm419 mm
HeightDiffers137 mm171 mm
WeightDiffers950 g1.03 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Vacuum wand assemblyNoNo
Packaging dataidentical
Number of packagesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons