Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Daewoo RCH-2100 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless vs Electrolux ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless

15specifications compared
7differ
8identical
18known for one product only

Key differences

The Daewoo RCH-2100 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless has 0.1 Ah more battery capacity than the Electrolux ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless (1.4 Ah vs 1.3 Ah). The Daewoo RCH-2100 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless has 6.4 V more battery voltage than the Electrolux ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless (10 V vs 3.6 V). The Electrolux ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless has 4 mm more width than the Daewoo RCH-2100 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless (127 mm vs 123 mm). Product colour: Blue on the Daewoo RCH-2100 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless, White on the Electrolux ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless. Weight: 1.2 kg on the Daewoo RCH-2100 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless, 950 g on the Electrolux ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless.

Product colour
- RCH-2100 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless:Blue
- ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless:White
Battery capacity
- RCH-2100 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless:1.4 Ah
- ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless:1.3 Ah
Battery voltage
- RCH-2100 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless:10 V
- ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless:3.6 V
Width
- RCH-2100 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless:123 mm
- ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless:127 mm
Depth
- RCH-2100 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless:122 mm
- ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless:410 mm
Height
- RCH-2100 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless:396 mm
- ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless:137 mm
Weight
- RCH-2100 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless:1.2 kg
- ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless:950 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of RCH-2100, ZB5003SW
33 specifications	A Daewoo RCH-2100 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless Model RCH-2100 View product	B Electrolux ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless Model ZB5003SW View product
Performanceidentical
Cleaning type	Dry	Dry
Noise levelKnown for one	73 dB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Air filtration stages quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Dirt separating methodKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Cyclonic
Design1 differ
Dust container type	Bagless	Bagless
Product colourDiffers	Blue	White
Dirt capacity dry	0.5 L	0.5 L
Ergonomicsidentical
Recharge indicatorKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Removable filter	Yes	Yes
Soft gripKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Washable filterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Battery low indicationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power2 differ
Runtime	8 min	8 min
Charging time	16 h	16 h
Suction powerKnown for one	50 AW	Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery capacityDiffers	1.4 Ah	1.3 Ah
Battery voltageDiffers	10 V	3.6 V
AC input voltageKnown for one	220 - 240 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power sourceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Battery
Runtime with motorized brush (high speed)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	8 min
Batteryidentical
Battery technology	Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)	Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	123 mm	127 mm
DepthDiffers	122 mm	410 mm
HeightDiffers	396 mm	137 mm
WeightDiffers	1.2 kg	950 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	467 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	134 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	150 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	1.46 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Vacuum brushes includedKnown for one	Cleaning brush	Unknown — not stated by the source
Vacuum wand assembly	No	No
Charging baseKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
ManualKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons