Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Bissell Pet Hair Eraser vs Philips MiniVac FC6152/01 handheld vacuum Black Bagless

15specifications compared
9differ
6identical
15known for one product only

Key differences

The Bissell Pet Hair Eraser has 0.1 L more dirt capacity dry than the Philips MiniVac FC6152/01 handheld vacuum Black Bagless (0.6 L vs 0.5 L). The Bissell Pet Hair Eraser has 5 min more runtime than the Philips MiniVac FC6152/01 handheld vacuum Black Bagless (15 min vs 10 min). The Philips MiniVac FC6152/01 handheld vacuum Black Bagless has 13 h more charging time than the Bissell Pet Hair Eraser (18 h vs 5 h). Dirt separating method: Filtering on the Bissell Pet Hair Eraser, Cyclonic on the Philips MiniVac FC6152/01 handheld vacuum Black Bagless. Product colour: Black, Lime on the Bissell Pet Hair Eraser, Black on the Philips MiniVac FC6152/01 handheld vacuum Black Bagless.

Dirt separating method
- Pet Hair Eraser:Filtering
- MiniVac FC6152/01 handheld vacuum Black Bagless:Cyclonic
Product colour
- Pet Hair Eraser:Black, Lime
- MiniVac FC6152/01 handheld vacuum Black Bagless:Black
Dirt capacity dry
- Pet Hair Eraser:0.6 L
- MiniVac FC6152/01 handheld vacuum Black Bagless:0.5 L
Runtime
- Pet Hair Eraser:15 min
- MiniVac FC6152/01 handheld vacuum Black Bagless:10 min
Charging time
- Pet Hair Eraser:5 h
- MiniVac FC6152/01 handheld vacuum Black Bagless:18 h
Battery voltage
- Pet Hair Eraser:14.4 V
- MiniVac FC6152/01 handheld vacuum Black Bagless:3.6 V
Width
- Pet Hair Eraser:410 mm
- MiniVac FC6152/01 handheld vacuum Black Bagless:133 mm
Depth
- Pet Hair Eraser:110 mm
- MiniVac FC6152/01 handheld vacuum Black Bagless:444 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Pet Hair Eraser, FC6152/01
30 specifications	A Bissell Pet Hair Eraser View product	B Philips MiniVac FC6152/01 handheld vacuum Black Bagless Model FC6152/01 View product
Performance1 differ
Cleaning type	Dry	Dry
Air filtration stages quantity	2	2
Dirt separating methodDiffers	Filtering	Cyclonic
Cleaning surfacesKnown for one	Bare floor, Carpet, Hard floor, Stair steps, Tile, Upholstery	Unknown — not stated by the source
Filtration systemKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Repairability indexKnown for one	5.4	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design2 differ
Dust container type	Bagless	Bagless
Product colourDiffers	Black, Lime	Black
Dirt capacity dryDiffers	0.6 L	0.5 L
Ergonomicsidentical
Wall mountableKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power3 differ
RuntimeDiffers	15 min	10 min
Charging timeDiffers	5 h	18 h
Battery voltageDiffers	14.4 V	3.6 V
Power sourceKnown for one	Battery	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum input powerKnown for one	80 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Batteryidentical
Battery technology	Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)	Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	410 mm	133 mm
DepthDiffers	110 mm	444 mm
HeightDiffers	171 mm	109 mm
WeightKnown for one	1.36 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Vacuum wand assembly	No	No
Charging baseKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Brush tool	Yes	Yes
Crevice toolKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Other featuresidentical
Battery recharge timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	18 h
Dust capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.5 L
Technical detailsidentical
Dangerous goodsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Packaging recyclability rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	90%
User manual recycled paperKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Packaging dataidentical
Package weightKnown for one	10 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons