Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Bissell Pet Hair Eraser vs Philips FC6142/71 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless

15specifications compared
12differ
3identical
18known for one product only

Key differences

The Bissell Pet Hair Eraser has 0.1 L more dirt capacity dry than the Philips FC6142/71 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless (0.6 L vs 0.5 L). The Bissell Pet Hair Eraser has 24 W more maximum input power than the Philips FC6142/71 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless (80 W vs 56 W). The Bissell Pet Hair Eraser has 6 min more runtime than the Philips FC6142/71 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless (15 min vs 9 min). Cleaning type: Dry on the Bissell Pet Hair Eraser, Dry&wet on the Philips FC6142/71 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless. Dirt separating method: Filtering on the Bissell Pet Hair Eraser, Cyclonic on the Philips FC6142/71 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless.

Cleaning type
- Pet Hair Eraser:Dry
- FC6142/71 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless:Dry&wet
Dirt separating method
- Pet Hair Eraser:Filtering
- FC6142/71 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless:Cyclonic
Product colour
- Pet Hair Eraser:Black, Lime
- FC6142/71 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless:Blue
Dirt capacity dry
- Pet Hair Eraser:0.6 L
- FC6142/71 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless:0.5 L
Maximum input power
- Pet Hair Eraser:80 W
- FC6142/71 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless:56 W
Runtime
- Pet Hair Eraser:15 min
- FC6142/71 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless:9 min
Charging time
- Pet Hair Eraser:5 h
- FC6142/71 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless:18 h
Battery voltage
- Pet Hair Eraser:14.4 V
- FC6142/71 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless:4.8 V

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Pet Hair Eraser, FC6142/71
33 specifications	A Bissell Pet Hair Eraser View product	B Philips FC6142/71 handheld vacuum Blue Bagless Model FC6142/71 View product
Performance2 differ
Cleaning typeDiffers	Dry	Dry&wet
AirflowKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	530 l/min
Dirt separating methodDiffers	Filtering	Cyclonic
Noise levelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	76 dB
Cleaning surfacesKnown for one	Bare floor, Carpet, Hard floor, Stair steps, Tile, Upholstery	Unknown — not stated by the source
Filtration systemKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Air filtration stages quantityKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Repairability indexKnown for one	5.4	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design2 differ
Product colourDiffers	Black, Lime	Blue
Dirt capacity dryDiffers	0.6 L	0.5 L
Liquid tank capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.11 L
Ergonomicsidentical
Wall mountableKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power4 differ
Maximum input powerDiffers	80 W	56 W
RuntimeDiffers	15 min	9 min
Charging timeDiffers	5 h	18 h
Suction powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	76 AW
Battery voltageDiffers	14.4 V	4.8 V
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	410 mm	460 mm
DepthDiffers	110 mm	160 mm
HeightDiffers	171 mm	160 mm
WeightDiffers	1.36 kg	1.4 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	508 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	335 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	490 mm
Package weightKnown for one	10 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Charging baseKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Crevice toolKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Vacuum wand assemblyKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Brush toolKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
VacuumKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.9 kPa

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons