Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Bissell Pet Hair Eraser vs Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6140/60

11specifications compared
7differ
4identical
25known for one product only

Key differences

The Bissell Pet Hair Eraser has 0.1 L more dirt capacity dry than the Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6140/60 (0.6 L vs 0.5 L). The Bissell Pet Hair Eraser has 35 W more maximum input power than the Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6140/60 (80 W vs 45 W). The Bissell Pet Hair Eraser has 6 min more runtime than the Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6140/60 (15 min vs 9 min). Product colour: Black, Lime on the Bissell Pet Hair Eraser, White on the Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6140/60.

Product colour
- Pet Hair Eraser:Black, Lime
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6140/60:White
Dirt capacity dry
- Pet Hair Eraser:0.6 L
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6140/60:0.5 L
Maximum input power
- Pet Hair Eraser:80 W
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6140/60:45 W
Runtime
- Pet Hair Eraser:15 min
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6140/60:9 min
Charging time
- Pet Hair Eraser:5 h
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6140/60:18 h
Battery voltage
- Pet Hair Eraser:14.4 V
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6140/60:3.6 V
Weight
- Pet Hair Eraser:1.36 kg
- MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6140/60:1.3 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Pet Hair Eraser, FC6140/60
36 specifications	A Bissell Pet Hair Eraser View product	B Philips MiniVac Handheld vacuum cleaner FC6140/60 Model FC6140/60 View product
Performanceidentical
Cleaning type	Dry	Dry
AirflowKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	620 l/min
Noise levelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	75 dB
Cleaning surfacesKnown for one	Bare floor, Carpet, Hard floor, Stair steps, Tile, Upholstery	Unknown — not stated by the source
Filtration systemKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Air filtration stages quantityKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dirt separating methodKnown for one	Filtering	Unknown — not stated by the source
Repairability indexKnown for one	5.4	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design2 differ
Dust container type	Bagless	Bagless
Product colourDiffers	Black, Lime	White
Dirt capacity dryDiffers	0.6 L	0.5 L
Ergonomicsidentical
Recharge indicatorKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Soft gripKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power4 differ
Maximum input powerDiffers	80 W	45 W
RuntimeDiffers	15 min	9 min
Charging timeDiffers	5 h	18 h
Suction powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	8 AW
Battery voltageDiffers	14.4 V	3.6 V
Power sourceKnown for one	Battery	Unknown — not stated by the source
Batteryidentical
Battery technology	Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)	Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	1.36 kg	1.3 kg
WidthKnown for one	410 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	110 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	171 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	160 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	460 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	160 mm
Package weightKnown for one	10 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Vacuum wand assembly	No	No
Charging baseKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Brush toolKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Dust capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.5 L
Maximum airflowKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	620 l/min
VacuumKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.7 kPa
A-box dimensions (LxWxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	508 x 335 x 490 mm
A-box number of piecesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	6 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons