Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Bissell Pet Hair Eraser vs Hoover SM156WDP4 011

14specifications compared
10differ
4identical
23known for one product only

Key differences

The Bissell Pet Hair Eraser has 0.4 L more dirt capacity dry than the Hoover SM156WDP4 011 (0.6 L vs 0.2 L). The Hoover SM156WDP4 011 has 2 min more runtime than the Bissell Pet Hair Eraser (17 min vs 15 min). The Hoover SM156WDP4 011 has 11 h more charging time than the Bissell Pet Hair Eraser (16 h vs 5 h). Cleaning type: Dry on the Bissell Pet Hair Eraser, Dry&wet on the Hoover SM156WDP4 011. Product colour: Black, Lime on the Bissell Pet Hair Eraser, Blue, White on the Hoover SM156WDP4 011.

Cleaning type
- Pet Hair Eraser:Dry
- SM156WDP4 011:Dry&wet
Product colour
- Pet Hair Eraser:Black, Lime
- SM156WDP4 011:Blue, White
Dirt capacity dry
- Pet Hair Eraser:0.6 L
- SM156WDP4 011:0.2 L
Runtime
- Pet Hair Eraser:15 min
- SM156WDP4 011:17 min
Charging time
- Pet Hair Eraser:5 h
- SM156WDP4 011:16 h
Battery voltage
- Pet Hair Eraser:14.4 V
- SM156WDP4 011:15.6 V
Width
- Pet Hair Eraser:410 mm
- SM156WDP4 011:400 mm
Depth
- Pet Hair Eraser:110 mm
- SM156WDP4 011:122 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Pet Hair Eraser, SM156WDP4 011
37 specifications	A Bissell Pet Hair Eraser View product	B Hoover SM156WDP4 011 View product
Performance1 differ
Cleaning typeDiffers	Dry	Dry&wet
Vacuum air filteringKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Micro
Cleaning surfacesKnown for one	Bare floor, Carpet, Hard floor, Stair steps, Tile, Upholstery	Unknown — not stated by the source
Filtration systemKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Air filtration stages quantityKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dirt separating methodKnown for one	Filtering	Unknown — not stated by the source
Repairability indexKnown for one	5.4	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design2 differ
Dust container type	Bagless	Bagless
Product colourDiffers	Black, Lime	Blue, White
Dirt capacity dryDiffers	0.6 L	0.2 L
Liquid tank capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.2 L
Ergonomicsidentical
Washable filterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Accessory storageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Battery low indicationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Ergonomic handleKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Removable filterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Wall mountableKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Power3 differ
Power source	Battery	Battery
RuntimeDiffers	15 min	17 min
Charging timeDiffers	5 h	16 h
Battery voltageDiffers	14.4 V	15.6 V
Battery typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	NiMH
Maximum input powerKnown for one	80 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Batteryidentical
Battery technology	Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)	Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)
Featuresidentical
Brand-specific featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	410 mm	400 mm
DepthDiffers	110 mm	122 mm
HeightDiffers	171 mm	161 mm
WeightDiffers	1.36 kg	1.42 kg
Weight (without accessories)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.42 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	230 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	167 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	442 mm
Package weightKnown for one	10 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Vacuum wand assembly	No	No
Brush toolKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Squeegee toolKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons