Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Bissell Pet Hair Eraser vs Hoover SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless

14specifications compared
9differ
5identical
14known for one product only

Key differences

The Bissell Pet Hair Eraser has 0.3 L more dirt capacity dry than the Hoover SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless (0.6 L vs 0.3 L). The Hoover SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless has 3 min more runtime than the Bissell Pet Hair Eraser (18 min vs 15 min). The Bissell Pet Hair Eraser has 7.2 V more battery voltage than the Hoover SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless (14.4 V vs 7.2 V). Product colour: Black, Lime on the Bissell Pet Hair Eraser, Green, White on the Hoover SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless. Weight: 1.36 kg on the Bissell Pet Hair Eraser, 900 g on the Hoover SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless.

Product colour
- Pet Hair Eraser:Black, Lime
- SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless:Green, White
Dirt capacity dry
- Pet Hair Eraser:0.6 L
- SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless:0.3 L
Runtime
- Pet Hair Eraser:15 min
- SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless:18 min
Battery voltage
- Pet Hair Eraser:14.4 V
- SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless:7.2 V
Width
- Pet Hair Eraser:410 mm
- SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless:120 mm
Depth
- Pet Hair Eraser:110 mm
- SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless:355 mm
Height
- Pet Hair Eraser:171 mm
- SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless:145 mm
Weight
- Pet Hair Eraser:1.36 kg
- SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless:900 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Pet Hair Eraser, SC72DWG
28 specifications	A Bissell Pet Hair Eraser View product	B Hoover SC72DWG handheld vacuum Green, White Bagless Model SC72DWG View product
Performanceidentical
Cleaning type	Dry	Dry
Cleaning surfacesKnown for one	Bare floor, Carpet, Hard floor, Stair steps, Tile, Upholstery	Unknown — not stated by the source
Filtration systemKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Air filtration stages quantityKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dirt separating methodKnown for one	Filtering	Unknown — not stated by the source
Repairability indexKnown for one	5.4	Unknown — not stated by the source
FilteringKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Design2 differ
Dust container type	Bagless	Bagless
Product colourDiffers	Black, Lime	Green, White
Dirt capacity dryDiffers	0.6 L	0.3 L
Power2 differ
Power sourceKnown for one	Battery	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum input powerKnown for one	80 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
RuntimeDiffers	15 min	18 min
Charging timeKnown for one	5 h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery voltageDiffers	14.4 V	7.2 V
Number of batteries supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	6
Batteryidentical
Battery technology	Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)	Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	410 mm	120 mm
DepthDiffers	110 mm	355 mm
HeightDiffers	171 mm	145 mm
WeightDiffers	1.36 kg	900 g
Packaging data1 differ
Package weightDiffers	10 kg	1.7 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Vacuum wand assembly	No	No
Brush tool	Yes	Yes
Dust bag includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Crevice toolKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ergonomicsidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Other featuresidentical
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	185 x 385 x 130 mm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons