Bissell Pet Hair Eraser vs Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless

Key differences

The Bissell Pet Hair Eraser has 0.1 L more dirt capacity dry than the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless (0.6 L vs 0.5 L). The Bissell Pet Hair Eraser has 2 min more runtime than the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless (15 min vs 13 min). The Bissell Pet Hair Eraser has 1 h more charging time than the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless (5 h vs 4 h). Dirt separating method: Filtering on the Bissell Pet Hair Eraser, Cyclonic on the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless. Product colour: Black, Lime on the Bissell Pet Hair Eraser, Red on the Electrolux ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless.

• Dirt separating method
  • Pet Hair Eraser:Filtering
  • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:Cyclonic
• Product colour
  • Pet Hair Eraser:Black, Lime
  • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:Red
• Dirt capacity dry
  • Pet Hair Eraser:0.6 L
  • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:0.5 L
• Runtime
  • Pet Hair Eraser:15 min
  • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:13 min
• Charging time
  • Pet Hair Eraser:5 h
  • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:4 h
• Battery voltage
  • Pet Hair Eraser:14.4 V
  • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:7.2 V
• Battery technology
  • Pet Hair Eraser:Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)
  • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)
• Width
  • Pet Hair Eraser:410 mm
  • ZB6106WR handheld vacuum Red Bagless:136 mm