Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Bissell Pet Hair Eraser vs Electrolux ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless

16specifications compared
10differ
6identical
11known for one product only

Key differences

The Bissell Pet Hair Eraser has 0.1 L more dirt capacity dry than the Electrolux ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless (0.6 L vs 0.5 L). The Bissell Pet Hair Eraser has 7 min more runtime than the Electrolux ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless (15 min vs 8 min). The Electrolux ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless has 11 h more charging time than the Bissell Pet Hair Eraser (16 h vs 5 h). Dirt separating method: Filtering on the Bissell Pet Hair Eraser, Cyclonic on the Electrolux ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless. Product colour: Black, Lime on the Bissell Pet Hair Eraser, White on the Electrolux ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless.

Dirt separating method
- Pet Hair Eraser:Filtering
- ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless:Cyclonic
Product colour
- Pet Hair Eraser:Black, Lime
- ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless:White
Dirt capacity dry
- Pet Hair Eraser:0.6 L
- ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless:0.5 L
Runtime
- Pet Hair Eraser:15 min
- ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless:8 min
Charging time
- Pet Hair Eraser:5 h
- ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless:16 h
Battery voltage
- Pet Hair Eraser:14.4 V
- ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless:3.6 V
Width
- Pet Hair Eraser:410 mm
- ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless:127 mm
Depth
- Pet Hair Eraser:110 mm
- ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless:410 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Pet Hair Eraser, ZB5003SW
27 specifications	A Bissell Pet Hair Eraser View product	B Electrolux ZB5003SW handheld vacuum White Bagless Model ZB5003SW View product
Performance1 differ
Cleaning type	Dry	Dry
Cleaning surfacesKnown for one	Bare floor, Carpet, Hard floor, Stair steps, Tile, Upholstery	Unknown — not stated by the source
Filtration systemKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Air filtration stages quantity	2	2
Dirt separating methodDiffers	Filtering	Cyclonic
Repairability indexKnown for one	5.4	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design2 differ
Dust container type	Bagless	Bagless
Product colourDiffers	Black, Lime	White
Dirt capacity dryDiffers	0.6 L	0.5 L
Power3 differ
Power source	Battery	Battery
Maximum input powerKnown for one	80 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
RuntimeDiffers	15 min	8 min
Charging timeDiffers	5 h	16 h
Battery voltageDiffers	14.4 V	3.6 V
Runtime with motorized brush (high speed)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	8 min
Battery capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.3 Ah
Batteryidentical
Battery technology	Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)	Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH)
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	410 mm	127 mm
DepthDiffers	110 mm	410 mm
HeightDiffers	171 mm	137 mm
WeightDiffers	1.36 kg	950 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package weightKnown for one	10 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Vacuum wand assembly	No	No
Brush toolKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Washable filterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Battery low indicationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Removable filterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons