Product comparison · 2 handheld vacuums

Bissell 2278N handheld vacuum Black Bagless vs Hoover SM18DL4 011

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 3identical
  • 27known for one product only

Key differences

The Bissell 2278N handheld vacuum Black Bagless has 0.15 L more dirt capacity dry than the Hoover SM18DL4 011 (0.65 L vs 0.5 L). The Hoover SM18DL4 011 has 2 min more runtime than the Bissell 2278N handheld vacuum Black Bagless (20 min vs 18 min). The Hoover SM18DL4 011 has 3.6 V more battery voltage than the Bissell 2278N handheld vacuum Black Bagless (18 V vs 14.4 V). Product colour: Black on the Bissell 2278N handheld vacuum Black Bagless, Black, Transparent on the Hoover SM18DL4 011.

  • Product colour
    • 2278N handheld vacuum Black Bagless:Black
    • SM18DL4 011:Black, Transparent
  • Dirt capacity dry
    • 2278N handheld vacuum Black Bagless:0.65 L
    • SM18DL4 011:0.5 L
  • Runtime
    • 2278N handheld vacuum Black Bagless:18 min
    • SM18DL4 011:20 min
  • Battery voltage
    • 2278N handheld vacuum Black Bagless:14.4 V
    • SM18DL4 011:18 V
  • Width
    • 2278N handheld vacuum Black Bagless:143 mm
    • SM18DL4 011:121 mm
  • Depth
    • 2278N handheld vacuum Black Bagless:197 mm
    • SM18DL4 011:161 mm
  • Height
    • 2278N handheld vacuum Black Bagless:438 mm
    • SM18DL4 011:400 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 2278N, SM18DL4 011
37 specifications
Performanceidentical
Cleaning typeDryDry
Vacuum air filteringKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMicro
Cleaning surfacesKnown for oneCarpet, Hard floor, Stair steps, UpholsteryUnknown — not stated by the source
Car careKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Filtration systemKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Air filtration stages quantityKnown for one3Unknown — not stated by the source
Dirt separating methodKnown for oneFilteringUnknown — not stated by the source
Repairability indexKnown for one5.4Unknown — not stated by the source
Design2 differ
Dust container typeBaglessBagless
Product colourDiffersBlackBlack, Transparent
Dirt capacity dryDiffers0.65 L0.5 L
Wheels materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRubber
Brush shapeKnown for oneRectangularUnknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Self-cleaning filterKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Washable filterKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Battery low indicationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ergonomic handleKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
LED indicatorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Wall mountableKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power2 differ
RuntimeDiffers18 min20 min
Charging timeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4 h
Battery voltageDiffers14.4 V18 V
Power sourceKnown for oneBatteryUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum input powerKnown for one80 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLithium-Ion (Li-Ion)
Featuresidentical
Brand-specific featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceADC Technology
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers143 mm121 mm
DepthDiffers197 mm161 mm
HeightDiffers438 mm400 mm
Weight (without accessories)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.28 kg
WeightKnown for one1.36 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Vacuum wand assemblyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Charging baseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Crevice toolYesYes
Vacuum brushes includedKnown for oneMotorized brushUnknown — not stated by the source
Upholstery nozzle includedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Squeegee toolKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld vacuum comparisons

All handheld vacuum comparisons