Product comparison · 2 handheld mobile computers

Zebra TC53 handheld mobile computer vs Zebra TC58E handheld mobile computer

38specifications compared
5differ
33identical
27known for one product only

Key differences

The Zebra TC53 handheld mobile computer has 0.3 GHz more processor frequency than the Zebra TC58E handheld mobile computer (2.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Zebra TC53 handheld mobile computer has 2,000 more processor model than the Zebra TC58E handheld mobile computer (6490 vs 4490). The Zebra TC58E handheld mobile computer has 0.1 more Bluetooth version than the Zebra TC53 handheld mobile computer (5.3 vs 5.2).

Processor frequency
- TC53 handheld mobile computer:2.7 GHz
- TC58E handheld mobile computer:2.4 GHz
Processor model
- TC53 handheld mobile computer:6490
- TC58E handheld mobile computer:4490
Bluetooth version
- TC53 handheld mobile computer:5.2
- TC58E handheld mobile computer:5.3
Weight
- TC53 handheld mobile computer:293 g
- TC58E handheld mobile computer:282 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of TC53, TC58E
65 specifications	A Zebra TC53 handheld mobile computer Model TC53 View product	B Zebra TC58E handheld mobile computer Model TC58E View product
Displayidentical
DisplayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	LED
Processor2 differ
Processor frequencyDiffers	2.7 GHz	2.4 GHz
Processor modelDiffers	6490	4490
Processor manufacturerKnown for one	Qualcomm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Built-in processorKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Processor familyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Qualcomm Kryo
Number of coresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	8
Network2 differ
Wi-Fi standardsDiffers	802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)	802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)
Bluetooth versionDiffers	5.2	5.3
Near Field Communication (NFC)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Security algorithmsKnown for one	EAP-PWD, EAP-TLS, EAP-TTLS, LEAP, MSCHAPv2, WEP, WPA-Enterprise, WPA-TKIP, WPA2-AES, WPA2-Enterprise, WPA2-TKIP, WPA3-Enterprise, WPA3-SAE	Unknown — not stated by the source
Data networkKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5G
Cameraidentical
Built-in flashKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Video recordingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Auto focusKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Audioidentical
Noise-cancelingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Headphone outputsKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Headphone connectivityKnown for one	3.5 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Performanceidentical
Phone functionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
International Protection (IP) codeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IP65, IP68
Sensorsidentical
Ambient light sensorKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
AccelerometerKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
GyroscopeKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
MagnetometerKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Pressure sensorKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Proximity sensorKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	293 g	282 g
GPS Performanceidentical
GPS (satellite)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
GLONASSKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
BeiDouKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
GalileoKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld mobile computer comparisons

All handheld mobile computer comparisons