Product comparison · 2 handheld mobile computers

Zebra MC3300x handheld mobile computer vs Zebra MC930P-GSHDG4RW handheld mobile computer

Add a product
  • 36specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 26identical
  • 14known for one product only

Key differences

The Zebra MC3300x handheld mobile computer has 256 GB more maximum memory card size than the Zebra MC930P-GSHDG4RW handheld mobile computer (512 GB vs 256 GB). The Zebra MC930P-GSHDG4RW handheld mobile computer has 260 g more weight than the Zebra MC3300x handheld mobile computer (765 g vs 505 g). The Zebra MC930P-GSHDG4RW handheld mobile computer has 13.3 mm more width than the Zebra MC3300x handheld mobile computer (88 mm vs 74.7 mm). Display diagonal: 10.2 cm (4") on the Zebra MC3300x handheld mobile computer, 10.9 cm (4.3") on the Zebra MC930P-GSHDG4RW handheld mobile computer. Compatible memory cards: MicroSD (TransFlash) on the Zebra MC3300x handheld mobile computer, MicroSD (TransFlash), SDHC, SDXC on the Zebra MC930P-GSHDG4RW handheld mobile computer.

  • Display diagonal
    • MC3300x handheld mobile computer:10.2 cm (4")
    • MC930P-GSHDG4RW handheld mobile computer:10.9 cm (4.3")
  • Maximum memory card size
    • MC3300x handheld mobile computer:512 GB
    • MC930P-GSHDG4RW handheld mobile computer:256 GB
  • International Protection (IP) code
    • MC3300x handheld mobile computer:IP64
    • MC930P-GSHDG4RW handheld mobile computer:IP65, IP67
  • Weight
    • MC3300x handheld mobile computer:505 g
    • MC930P-GSHDG4RW handheld mobile computer:765 g
  • Width
    • MC3300x handheld mobile computer:74.7 mm
    • MC930P-GSHDG4RW handheld mobile computer:88 mm
  • Depth
    • MC3300x handheld mobile computer:163.9 mm
    • MC930P-GSHDG4RW handheld mobile computer:240 mm
  • Height
    • MC3300x handheld mobile computer:202.6 mm
    • MC930P-GSHDG4RW handheld mobile computer:189 mm
  • Battery capacity
    • MC3300x handheld mobile computer:7000 mAh
    • MC930P-GSHDG4RW handheld mobile computer:5000 mAh

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of MC3300x, MC930P-GSHDG4RW
50 specifications
Display1 differ
Display diagonalDiffers10.2 cm (4")10.9 cm (4.3")
Touch technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDual-touch
Touchscreen typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCapacitive
DisplayKnown for oneLEDUnknown — not stated by the source
Memory2 differ
Compatible memory cardsDiffersMicroSD (TransFlash)MicroSD (TransFlash), SDHC, SDXC
Maximum memory card sizeDiffers512 GB256 GB
Processoridentical
Processor manufacturerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceQualcomm
Built-in processorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Network1 differ
Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Data networkKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNot supported
Security algorithmsDiffersAES, EAP-TTLS, TKIP, WEP, WPA, WPA2, WPA3EAP-TLS, EAP-TTLS, FIPS 140-2, LEAP, MSCHAPv2, WEP, WMM, WPA, WPA-AES, WPA-Enterprise, WPA-TKIP, WPA2, WPA2-Enterprise
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Performance1 differ
International Protection (IP) codeDiffersIP64IP65, IP67
Barcode readerKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Keyboard layoutKnown for oneNumericUnknown — not stated by the source
Sensorsidentical
Ambient light sensorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
GyroscopeKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Softwareidentical
Operating system versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8.1
Poweridentical
Battery voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.6 V
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WeightDiffers505 g765 g
WidthDiffers74.7 mm88 mm
DepthDiffers163.9 mm240 mm
HeightDiffers202.6 mm189 mm
Battery1 differ
Battery capacityDiffers7000 mAh5000 mAh

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More handheld mobile computer comparisons

All handheld mobile computer comparisons