Product comparison · 2 gpus

Matrox LUMA A310 vs Matrox LUMA A380

23specifications compared
7differ
16identical
3known for one product only

Key differences

Graphics processor
- LUMA A310:Arc A310
- LUMA A380:Arc A380
Discrete graphics card memory
- LUMA A310:4 GB
- LUMA A380:6 GB
Cooling type
- LUMA A310:Passive
- LUMA A380:Active
Power consumption (typical)
- LUMA A310:30 W
- LUMA A380:75 W
Length
- LUMA A310:167 mm
- LUMA A380:253 mm
Height
- LUMA A310:68 mm
- LUMA A380:126 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of LUMA-A310, LUMA-A380
26 specifications	A Matrox LUMA A310 Model LUMA-A310 View product	B Matrox LUMA A380 Model LUMA-A380 View product
Processor1 differ
Graphics processorDiffers	Arc A310	Arc A380
Maximum displays per videocardKnown for one	4	Unknown — not stated by the source
Memory1 differ
Discrete graphics card memoryDiffers	4 GB	6 GB
Ports & interfacesidentical
Mini DisplayPorts quantityKnown for one	4	Unknown — not stated by the source
DisplayPorts quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4
Design2 differ
Cooling typeDiffers	Passive	Active
Form factorDiffers	Half-Height/Half-Length (HH/HL)	Full-Height/Full-Length (FH/FL)
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	30 W	75 W
Weight & dimensions2 differ
LengthDiffers	167 mm	253 mm
HeightDiffers	68 mm	126 mm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More gpu comparisons

All gpu comparisons