Product comparison · 2 gpus

Matrox LUMA A310 vs Matrox LUMA Pro A310 Quad

Add a product
  • 23specifications compared
  • 2differ
  • 21identical
  • 2known for one product only

Key differences

  • Cooling type
    • LUMA A310:Passive
    • LUMA Pro A310 Quad:Active
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • LUMA A310:30 W
    • LUMA Pro A310 Quad:50 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of LUMA-A310, LUMA-A310FP
25 specifications
A

Matrox

LUMA A310

Model LUMA-A310

View product
B

Matrox

LUMA Pro A310 Quad

Model LUMA-A310FP

View product
Processoridentical
Graphics processorKnown for oneArc A310Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum displays per videocardKnown for one4Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Cooling typeDiffersPassiveActive
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs30 W50 W

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More gpu comparisons

All gpu comparisons