All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 gateways/controllers

TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s vs TP-Link Omada OC400(UN) gateway/controller 1000, 10000 Mbit/s

Add a product
  • 13specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 6identical
  • 20known for one product only

Key differences

The TP-Link Omada OC400(UN) gateway/controller 1000, 10000 Mbit/s has 2 more Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports than the TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s (4 vs 2). The TP-Link Omada OC400(UN) gateway/controller 1000, 10000 Mbit/s has 82 mm more depth than the TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s (180 mm vs 98 mm). The TP-Link Omada OC400(UN) gateway/controller 1000, 10000 Mbit/s has 19 mm more height than the TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s (44 mm vs 25 mm). Product colour: Black on the TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s, Grey on the TP-Link Omada OC400(UN) gateway/controller 1000, 10000 Mbit/s. Ethernet LAN data rates: 10,100,1000 Mbit/s on the TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s, 1000,10000 Mbit/s on the TP-Link Omada OC400(UN) gateway/controller 1000, 10000 Mbit/s.

  • Product colour
    • Black
    • Grey
  • Ethernet LAN data rates
    • 10,100,1000 Mbit/s
    • 1000,10000 Mbit/s
  • Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
    • 2
    • 4
  • Depth
    • 98 mm
    • 180 mm
  • Height
    • 25 mm
    • 44 mm
  • Width
    • 100 mm
    • 440 mm
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • -5 - 50 °C
    • 0 - 40 °C

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
33 specifications
A

TP-Link

Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s

Model OC220

View product
B

TP-Link

Omada OC400(UN) gateway/controller 1000, 10000 Mbit/s

Model OC400(UN)

View product
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersBlackGrey
LED indicatorsYesYes
Performanceidentical
Control display unitNoNo
Built-in processorKnown for oneYes
Internal memoryKnown for one8 MB
Internal memory typeKnown for oneDDR4
SSD capacityKnown for one32 GB
Flash memoryKnown for one4 MB
Network1 differ
Ethernet LAN data ratesDiffers10,100,1000 Mbit/s1000,10000 Mbit/s
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for one2
Number of console portsKnown for one1
DC-in jackKnown for oneYes
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers24
SFP+ ports quantityKnown for one2
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one1
Management featuresidentical
Management platformKnown for oneOmada App
Performance managementKnown for one• Up to 1,000 Omada access points, 200 Omada switches, and 100 Omada routers* • Up to 30,000 clients
Reset buttonYesYes
Poweridentical
Input voltageKnown for one100 - 240 V
Input frequencyKnown for one50/60 Hz
Weight & dimensions3 differ
DepthDiffers98 mm180 mm
HeightDiffers25 mm44 mm
WidthDiffers100 mm440 mm
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneLAN (RJ-45), Power
Packaging contentKnown for one• Omada Hardware Controller OC400 • Quick Installation Guide • Ethernet Cable • Power Cord • Rackmount Kit
Quick installation guideKnown for oneYes
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs-5 - 50 °C0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)-40 - 70 °C-40 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)10 - 90%10 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)5 - 90%5 - 90%
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability complianceKnown for oneYes
Certificatesidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneCE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), RoHS
Softwareidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneWindows 7/8/10/11, Vista, XP or MAC OS, NetWare, UNIX or Linux

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More gateways/controllers comparisons

All gateways/controllers comparisons