TP-Link AC50 Wireless Controller vs TP-Link Omada Hardware Controller

Key differences

The TP-Link Omada Hardware Controller has 1,872 MB more internal memory than the TP-Link AC50 Wireless Controller (2000 MB vs 128 MB). The TP-Link AC50 Wireless Controller has 14 MB more flash memory than the TP-Link Omada Hardware Controller (16 MB vs 2 MB). The TP-Link AC50 Wireless Controller has 3 more Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports than the TP-Link Omada Hardware Controller (5 vs 2). Internal memory type: DDR2 on the TP-Link AC50 Wireless Controller, DDR4 on the TP-Link Omada Hardware Controller. Ethernet LAN data rates: 10,100 Mbit/s on the TP-Link AC50 Wireless Controller, 10,100,1000 Mbit/s on the TP-Link Omada Hardware Controller.

• Internal memory
  • AC50 Wireless Controller:128 MB
  • Omada Hardware Controller:2000 MB
• Internal memory type
  • AC50 Wireless Controller:DDR2
  • Omada Hardware Controller:DDR4
• Flash memory
  • AC50 Wireless Controller:16 MB
  • Omada Hardware Controller:2 MB
• Ethernet LAN data rates
  • AC50 Wireless Controller:10,100 Mbit/s
  • Omada Hardware Controller:10,100,1000 Mbit/s
• Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
  • AC50 Wireless Controller:5
  • Omada Hardware Controller:2
• Depth
  • AC50 Wireless Controller:126 mm
  • Omada Hardware Controller:180 mm
• Height
  • AC50 Wireless Controller:26 mm
  • Omada Hardware Controller:44 mm
• Width
  • AC50 Wireless Controller:209 mm
  • Omada Hardware Controller:294 mm