QNAP QuWakeUp QWU-100 vs TP-Link Omada Hardware Controller

Key differences

The TP-Link Omada Hardware Controller has 1,488 MB more internal memory than the QNAP QuWakeUp QWU-100 (2000 MB vs 512 MB). The QNAP QuWakeUp QWU-100 has 3,998 MB more flash memory than the TP-Link Omada Hardware Controller (4000 MB vs 2 MB). The TP-Link Omada Hardware Controller has 5.74 W more power consumption (typical) than the QNAP QuWakeUp QWU-100 (9 W vs 3.26 W). LED indicators: LAN, Status on the QNAP QuWakeUp QWU-100, Yes on the TP-Link Omada Hardware Controller. Cables included: USB Type-C on the QNAP QuWakeUp QWU-100, LAN (RJ-45) on the TP-Link Omada Hardware Controller.

• LED indicators
  • QuWakeUp QWU-100:LAN, Status
  • Omada Hardware Controller:Yes
• Internal memory
  • QuWakeUp QWU-100:512 MB
  • Omada Hardware Controller:2000 MB
• Flash memory
  • QuWakeUp QWU-100:4000 MB
  • Omada Hardware Controller:2 MB
• Power consumption (typical)
  • QuWakeUp QWU-100:3.26 W
  • Omada Hardware Controller:9 W
• Depth
  • QuWakeUp QWU-100:101.3 mm
  • Omada Hardware Controller:180 mm
• Height
  • QuWakeUp QWU-100:25 mm
  • Omada Hardware Controller:44 mm
• Width
  • QuWakeUp QWU-100:101 mm
  • Omada Hardware Controller:294 mm
• Cables included
  • QuWakeUp QWU-100:USB Type-C
  • Omada Hardware Controller:LAN (RJ-45)