Product comparison · 2 gateways/controllers

QNAP QuWakeUp QWU-100 vs TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s

Add a product
  • 11specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 6identical
  • 21known for one product only

Key differences

The QNAP QuWakeUp QWU-100 has 3.3 mm more depth than the TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s (101.3 mm vs 98 mm). The QNAP QuWakeUp QWU-100 has 1 mm more width than the TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s (101 mm vs 100 mm). LED indicators: LAN, Status on the QNAP QuWakeUp QWU-100, Yes on the TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s. Operating temperature (T-T): -5 - 45 °C on the QNAP QuWakeUp QWU-100, -5 - 50 °C on the TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s. Operating relative humidity (H-H): 5 - 95% on the QNAP QuWakeUp QWU-100, 10 - 90% on the TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s.

  • LED indicators
    • QuWakeUp QWU-100:LAN, Status
    • Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:Yes
  • Depth
    • QuWakeUp QWU-100:101.3 mm
    • Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:98 mm
  • Width
    • QuWakeUp QWU-100:101 mm
    • Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:100 mm
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • QuWakeUp QWU-100:-5 - 45 °C
    • Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:-5 - 50 °C
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • QuWakeUp QWU-100:5 - 95%
    • Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:10 - 90%

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of QuWakeUp QWU-100, OC220
32 specifications
Design1 differ
Product colourBlackBlack
LED indicatorsDiffersLAN, StatusYes
Performanceidentical
Control display unitNoNo
Built-in processorKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Processor frequencyKnown for one900 MHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of processors installedKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Internal memoryKnown for one512 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Flash memoryKnown for one4000 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Networkidentical
Networking standardsKnown for oneIEEE 802.3afUnknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB 2.0 ports quantity11
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports22
Management featuresidentical
Reset buttonYesYes
Web-based managementKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one3.26 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions2 differ
DepthDiffers101.3 mm98 mm
Height25 mm25 mm
WidthDiffers101 mm100 mm
WeightKnown for one280 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package depthKnown for one112 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one58 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package widthKnown for one140 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one440 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneUSB Type-CUnknown — not stated by the source
Quick installation guideKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs-5 - 45 °C-5 - 50 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs5 - 95%10 - 90%
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-40 - 70 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 - 90%
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one85176990Unknown — not stated by the source
Softwareidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWindows 7/8/10/11, Vista, XP or MAC OS, NetWare, UNIX or Linux

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More gateways/controllers comparisons

All gateways/controllers comparisons