Opengear 32 SERIAL DUAL AC 2GBE ETHERNET vs TP-Link Omada Hardware Controller

Key differences

The TP-Link Omada Hardware Controller has 1,744 MB more internal memory than the Opengear 32 SERIAL DUAL AC 2GBE ETHERNET (2000 MB vs 256 MB). The Opengear 32 SERIAL DUAL AC 2GBE ETHERNET has 62 MB more flash memory than the TP-Link Omada Hardware Controller (64 MB vs 2 MB). The Opengear 32 SERIAL DUAL AC 2GBE ETHERNET has 31 W more power consumption (typical) than the TP-Link Omada Hardware Controller (40 W vs 9 W). Cables included: AC on the Opengear 32 SERIAL DUAL AC 2GBE ETHERNET, LAN (RJ-45) on the TP-Link Omada Hardware Controller.

• Internal memory
  • 32 SERIAL DUAL AC 2GBE ETHERNET:256 MB
  • Omada Hardware Controller:2000 MB
• Flash memory
  • 32 SERIAL DUAL AC 2GBE ETHERNET:64 MB
  • Omada Hardware Controller:2 MB
• Power consumption (typical)
  • 32 SERIAL DUAL AC 2GBE ETHERNET:40 W
  • Omada Hardware Controller:9 W
• Input voltage
  • 32 SERIAL DUAL AC 2GBE ETHERNET:110 - 240 V
  • Omada Hardware Controller:100 - 240 V
• Cables included
  • 32 SERIAL DUAL AC 2GBE ETHERNET:AC
  • Omada Hardware Controller:LAN (RJ-45)