Product comparison · 2 gateways/controllers

Dahua Technology VSAG200-E gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s vs QNAP QuWakeUp QWU-100

6specifications compared
5differ
1identical
28known for one product only

Key differences

The Dahua Technology VSAG200-E gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s has 4 more Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports than the QNAP QuWakeUp QWU-100 (6 vs 2). The Dahua Technology VSAG200-E gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s has 21.74 W more power consumption (typical) than the QNAP QuWakeUp QWU-100 (25 W vs 3.26 W). The Dahua Technology VSAG200-E gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s has 328.7 mm more depth than the QNAP QuWakeUp QWU-100 (430 mm vs 101.3 mm).

Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
- VSAG200-E gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:6
- QuWakeUp QWU-100:2
Power consumption (typical)
- VSAG200-E gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:25 W
- QuWakeUp QWU-100:3.26 W
Depth
- VSAG200-E gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:430 mm
- QuWakeUp QWU-100:101.3 mm
Height
- VSAG200-E gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:44.5 mm
- QuWakeUp QWU-100:25 mm
Width
- VSAG200-E gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:300 mm
- QuWakeUp QWU-100:101 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of VSAG200-E, QuWakeUp QWU-100
34 specifications	A Dahua Technology VSAG200-E gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s Model VSAG200-E View product	B QNAP QuWakeUp QWU-100 View product
Designidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	LAN, Status
Rack capacityKnown for one	1U	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mounting typeKnown for one	Rack mounting	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Control display unitKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Built-in processorKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Processor frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	900 MHz
Number of processors installedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Internal memoryKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	512 MB
Flash memoryKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4000 MB
Networkidentical
Networking standardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IEEE 802.3af
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one	10,100,1000 Mbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers	6	2
Management featuresidentical
Reset buttonKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Web-based managementKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	25 W	3.26 W
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Weight & dimensions3 differ
DepthDiffers	430 mm	101.3 mm
HeightDiffers	44.5 mm	25 mm
WidthDiffers	300 mm	101 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	280 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	112 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	58 mm
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	140 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	440 g
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB Type-C
Quick installation guideKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-5 - 45 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 95%
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	85176990
Featuresidentical
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Securityidentical
Security algorithmsKnown for one	IPSec	Unknown — not stated by the source
Firewall securityKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More gateways/controllers comparisons

All gateways/controllers comparisons