Product comparison · 2 gateways/controllers

Dahua Technology VPS100 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s vs TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s

4specifications compared
3differ
1identical
17known for one product only

Key differences

The Dahua Technology VPS100 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s has 1 more USB 2.0 ports quantity than the TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s (2 vs 1). The Dahua Technology VPS100 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s has 4 more Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports than the TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s (6 vs 2). Product colour: Stainless steel on the Dahua Technology VPS100 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s, Black on the TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s.

Product colour
- VPS100 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:Stainless steel
- Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:Black
USB 2.0 ports quantity
- VPS100 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:2
- Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:1
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
- VPS100 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:6
- Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s:2

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of VPS100, OC220
21 specifications	A Dahua Technology VPS100 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s Model VPS100 View product	B TP-Link Omada OC220 gateway/controller 10, 100, 1000 Mbit/s Model OC220 View product
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffers	Stainless steel	Black
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Rack capacityKnown for one	1U	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mounting typeKnown for one	Rack mounting	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Control display unitKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Networkidentical
Ethernet LAN data rates	10,100,1000 Mbit/s	10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Number of concurrent sessions (max)Known for one	10	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces2 differ
USB 2.0 ports quantityDiffers	2	1
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers	6	2
Number of console portsKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Management featuresidentical
Reset buttonKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Web-based managementKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Softwareidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Windows 7/8/10/11, Vista, XP or MAC OS, NetWare, UNIX or Linux
Weight & dimensionsidentical
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	98 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	25 mm
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 mm
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-5 - 50 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-40 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 90%
Securityidentical
Security algorithmsKnown for one	SNMP, SNMPv2, SNMPv3, SSH	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More gateways/controllers comparisons

All gateways/controllers comparisons